Muse Spark Open is $0.75 cheaper per 1M input tokens (37.5% lower; 1.6x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewMuse Spark Open vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch)
Pick Muse Spark Open when budget and context both matter.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Muse Spark Open when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Muse Spark Open is estimated at $3.38 vs $5 for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch), saving $1.62 (32.5% lower).
Cost-first pickMuse Spark Open
Context-first pickMuse Spark Open
Sample savings$1.6232.5%
10x traffic gap$16.25
Muse Spark Open is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $16.25. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Muse Spark Open stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Muse Spark Open | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Muse Spark Open | $8.38 | $13 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Muse Spark Open | $5.5 | $8 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Muse Spark Open | $22.5 | $32 |
Muse Spark Open is $1.75 cheaper per 1M output tokens (29.2% lower; 1.41x difference).
Muse Spark Open has 38.58K more context (1.04x larger).
Muse Spark Open is $1.62 cheaper on the standard workload (32.5% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Muse Spark Open has the lower input price; Muse Spark Open has the lower output price; Muse Spark Open offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Muse Spark Open is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $3.38 for Muse Spark Open and $5 for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch).
Choose Muse Spark Open when you care most about lower input-token price, lower output-token price, and larger context window.
Choose Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Muse Spark Open is estimated at $3.38 vs $5 for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch), saving $1.62 (32.5% lower).
- Muse Spark Open is $1.62 cheaper on the standard workload (32.5% lower).
- Muse Spark Open is $0.75 cheaper per 1M input tokens (37.5% lower; 1.6x difference).
- Muse Spark Open is $1.75 cheaper per 1M output tokens (29.2% lower; 1.41x difference).
- Muse Spark Open has 38.58K more context (1.04x larger).
| Feature | NewMuse Spark Open (Meta) | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $1.25 | $2 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $4.25 | $6 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $3.38 | $5 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 1.01M |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Muse Spark Open | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Muse Spark Open is estimated at $3.38 vs $5 for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch), saving $1.62 (32.5% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Muse Spark Open | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Muse Spark Open | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Muse Spark Open | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free) can replace Muse Spark Open when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Llama 3.2 3B Instruct (free) can replace Muse Spark Open when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Llama 3.1 8B Instruct can replace Muse Spark Open when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.09.
- Llama 3.2 1B Instruct can replace Muse Spark Open when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.13.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 1.31M context with $0.47 sample workload cost.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.28 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Step 5 Preview · StepFun · #2
- GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #3
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash · Xiaomi · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsMeta catalog
Review all tracked Meta models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Meta modelsQwen catalog
Check other Qwen models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Qwen modelsMuse Spark Open is a coding-optimized open-weight model. Trained specifically for agentic coding workflows, it delivers higher first-attempt accuracy, reliable tool calling, and deep codebase understanding across the repos developers...
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is an open-weight sparse mixture-of-experts model from Qwen and the open-weight variant of [Qwen3.8 Max](/qwen/qwen3.8-max), with 95 billion active parameters out of 2.4 trillion total. It is...