LFM2.5-24B-A2B is $1.2 cheaper per 1M input tokens (96% lower; 25x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewMuse Spark Open vs NewLFM2.5-24B-A2B
Pick LFM2.5-24B-A2B for lower cost; pick Muse Spark Open only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick LFM2.5-24B-A2B for lower cost; pick Muse Spark Open only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, LFM2.5-24B-A2B is estimated at $0.4 vs $3.38 for Muse Spark Open, saving $2.98 (88.1% lower).
Cost-first pickLFM2.5-24B-A2B
Context-first pickMuse Spark Open
Sample savings$2.9888.1%
10x traffic gap$29.75
Muse Spark Open has more context, but LFM2.5-24B-A2B saves $2.98 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $29.75. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
LFM2.5-24B-A2B stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Muse Spark Open | LFM2.5-24B-A2B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | $8.38 | $0.6 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | $5.5 | $0.75 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | $22.5 | $3.55 |
LFM2.5-24B-A2B is $3.55 cheaper per 1M output tokens (83.5% lower; 6.07x difference).
Muse Spark Open has 920.58K more context (8.19x larger).
LFM2.5-24B-A2B is $2.98 cheaper on the standard workload (88.1% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
LFM2.5-24B-A2B has the lower input price; LFM2.5-24B-A2B has the lower output price; Muse Spark Open offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, LFM2.5-24B-A2B is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $3.38 for Muse Spark Open and $0.4 for LFM2.5-24B-A2B.
Choose Muse Spark Open when you care most about larger context window.
Choose LFM2.5-24B-A2B when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, LFM2.5-24B-A2B is estimated at $0.4 vs $3.38 for Muse Spark Open, saving $2.98 (88.1% lower).
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B is $2.98 cheaper on the standard workload (88.1% lower).
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B is $1.2 cheaper per 1M input tokens (96% lower; 25x difference).
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B is $3.55 cheaper per 1M output tokens (83.5% lower; 6.07x difference).
- Muse Spark Open has 920.58K more context (8.19x larger).
| Feature | NewMuse Spark Open (Meta) | NewLFM2.5-24B-A2B (LiquidAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $1.25 | $0.05 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $4.25 | $0.7 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $3.38 | $0.4 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 128K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, LFM2.5-24B-A2B is estimated at $0.4 vs $3.38 for Muse Spark Open, saving $2.98 (88.1% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Muse Spark Open | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free) can replace Muse Spark Open when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Llama 3.2 3B Instruct (free) can replace Muse Spark Open when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Llama 3.1 8B Instruct can replace Muse Spark Open when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.09.
- Llama 3.2 1B Instruct can replace Muse Spark Open when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.13.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 1.31M context with $0.47 sample workload cost.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.28 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Step 5 Preview · StepFun · #2
- GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #3
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash · Xiaomi · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsMeta catalog
Review all tracked Meta models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Meta modelsLiquidAI catalog
Check other LiquidAI models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open LiquidAI modelsMuse Spark Open is a coding-optimized open-weight model. Trained specifically for agentic coding workflows, it delivers higher first-attempt accuracy, reliable tool calling, and deep codebase understanding across the repos developers...
LFM2.5-24B-A2B is a mixture-of-experts reasoning model from Liquid AI with 24B total and 2.45B active parameters. It always reasons before answering and is built for agents that call tools. Liquid...