API cost decision in 10 seconds

Muse Spark 1.2 vs Granite 4.1 8B

Pick Granite 4.1 8B for lower cost; pick Muse Spark 1.2 only if the larger context window matters more.

Page updated:  Data confirmed:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Granite 4.1 8B for lower cost; pick Muse Spark 1.2 only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Granite 4.1 8B is estimated at $0.1 vs $3.38 for Muse Spark 1.2, saving $3.27 (97% lower).

Cost-first pickGranite 4.1 8B
Context-first pickMuse Spark 1.2
Sample savings$3.2797%
10x traffic gap$32.75

Muse Spark 1.2 has more context, but Granite 4.1 8B saves $3.27 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $32.75. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Granite 4.1 8B stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickMuse Spark 1.2Granite 4.1 8B
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputGranite 4.1 8B$8.38$0.3
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputGranite 4.1 8B$5.5$0.15
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputGranite 4.1 8B$22.5$0.55
Cheaper input Granite 4.1 8B $1.25 vs $0.05 / 1M

Granite 4.1 8B is $1.2 cheaper per 1M input tokens (96% lower; 25x difference).

Cheaper output Granite 4.1 8B $4.25 vs $0.1 / 1M

Granite 4.1 8B is $4.15 cheaper per 1M output tokens (97.6% lower; 42.5x difference).

Larger context Muse Spark 1.2 1.05M vs 131.07K

Muse Spark 1.2 has 917.5K more context (8x larger).

Sample workload Granite 4.1 8B $3.38 vs $0.1

Granite 4.1 8B is $3.27 cheaper on the standard workload (97% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
Muse Spark 1.2 Calculating… Estimated API cost
Granite 4.1 8B Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Granite 4.1 8B has the lower input price; Granite 4.1 8B has the lower output price; Muse Spark 1.2 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Granite 4.1 8B is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $3.38 for Muse Spark 1.2 and $0.1 for Granite 4.1 8B.

Best Fit

Choose Muse Spark 1.2 when you care most about larger context window.

Choose Granite 4.1 8B when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Granite 4.1 8B is estimated at $0.1 vs $3.38 for Muse Spark 1.2, saving $3.27 (97% lower).
  • Granite 4.1 8B is $3.27 cheaper on the standard workload (97% lower).
  • Granite 4.1 8B is $1.2 cheaper per 1M input tokens (96% lower; 25x difference).
  • Granite 4.1 8B is $4.15 cheaper per 1M output tokens (97.6% lower; 42.5x difference).
  • Muse Spark 1.2 has 917.5K more context (8x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureMuse Spark 1.2
(Meta)
Granite 4.1 8B
(IBM)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$1.25$0.05
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$4.25$0.1
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$3.38$0.1
Context Window1.05M131.07K
Release Date

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionGranite 4.1 8BOn the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Granite 4.1 8B is estimated at $0.1 vs $3.38 for Muse Spark 1.2, saving $3.27 (97% lower).
High-volume input processingGranite 4.1 8BLower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsGranite 4.1 8BLower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workMuse Spark 1.2A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Meta catalog

Review all tracked Meta models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Meta models

IBM catalog

Check other IBM models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open IBM models
Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 is a reasoning model from Meta, designed for complex agentic tasks. It accepts text, images, video, audio, and PDF documents, returns text, and offers a 1M-token context...

Granite 4.1 8B

Granite 4.1 8B is a dense, decoder-only 8-billion-parameter language model from IBM, part of the Granite 4.1 family. It supports a 131K-token context window and is designed for enterprise tasks...