Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest is $0.25 cheaper per 1M input tokens (20% lower; 1.25x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
Muse Spark 1.1 vs Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest
Pick Muse Spark 1.1 when budget and context both matter.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Muse Spark 1.1 when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Muse Spark 1.1 is estimated at $3.38 vs $3.5 for Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest, saving $0.12 (3.6% lower).
Cost-first pickMuse Spark 1.1
Context-first pickMuse Spark 1.1
Sample savings$0.123.6%
10x traffic gap$1.25
Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $1.25. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest, balanced workload favors Muse Spark 1.1, and output-heavy chatbot favors Muse Spark 1.1.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Muse Spark 1.1 | Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest | $8.38 | $7.5 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Muse Spark 1.1 | $5.5 | $6 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Muse Spark 1.1 | $22.5 | $26 |
Muse Spark 1.1 is $0.75 cheaper per 1M output tokens (15% lower; 1.18x difference).
Muse Spark 1.1 has 848.58K more context (5.24x larger).
Muse Spark 1.1 is $0.12 cheaper on the standard workload (3.6% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest has the lower input price; Muse Spark 1.1 has the lower output price; Muse Spark 1.1 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $3.38 for Muse Spark 1.1 and $3.5 for Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest.
Choose Muse Spark 1.1 when you care most about lower output-token price, and larger context window.
Choose Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest when you care most about lower input-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Muse Spark 1.1 is estimated at $3.38 vs $3.5 for Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest, saving $0.12 (3.6% lower).
- Muse Spark 1.1 is $0.12 cheaper on the standard workload (3.6% lower).
- Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest is $0.25 cheaper per 1M input tokens (20% lower; 1.25x difference).
- Muse Spark 1.1 is $0.75 cheaper per 1M output tokens (15% lower; 1.18x difference).
- Muse Spark 1.1 has 848.58K more context (5.24x larger).
| Feature | Muse Spark 1.1 (Meta) | Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest (Anthropic) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $1.25 | $1 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $4.25 | $5 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $3.38 | $3.5 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 200K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Muse Spark 1.1 | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Muse Spark 1.1 is estimated at $3.38 vs $3.5 for Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest, saving $0.12 (3.6% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Muse Spark 1.1 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Muse Spark 1.1 | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free) can replace Muse Spark 1.1 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Llama 3.2 3B Instruct (free) can replace Muse Spark 1.1 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Llama 3.1 8B Instruct can replace Muse Spark 1.1 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.09.
- Llama 3.2 1B Instruct can replace Muse Spark 1.1 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.13.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.17 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.11 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · DeepSeek · #1
- MiMo-V2.5 · Xiaomi · #2
- Hy3 · Tencent · #3
- Ox Alpha · stealth · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsMeta catalog
Review all tracked Meta models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Meta modelsAnthropic catalog
Check other Anthropic models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Anthropic modelsMuse Spark 1.1 is a multimodal reasoning model from Meta, built for agentic tasks. It accepts text, images, video, audio, and PDF documents and returns text, with a 1M-token context...
This model always redirects to the latest model in the Anthropic Claude Haiku family.