DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) is $0.21 cheaper per 1M input tokens (60% lower; 2.5x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
Muse Glimmer 30B (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch)
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) when budget and context both matter.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) is estimated at $0.28 vs $1.1 for Muse Glimmer 30B (batch), saving $0.82 (74.5% lower).
Cost-first pickDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch)
Context-first pickDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch)
Sample savings$0.8274.5%
10x traffic gap$8.2
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $8.2. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Muse Glimmer 30B (batch) | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) | $2.5 | $0.84 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) | $1.85 | $0.42 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) | $7.85 | $1.54 |
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) is $1.22 cheaper per 1M output tokens (81.3% lower; 5.36x difference).
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) has 917.5K more context (8x larger).
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) is $0.82 cheaper on the standard workload (74.5% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) has the lower input price; DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) has the lower output price; DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $1.1 for Muse Glimmer 30B (batch) and $0.28 for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch).
Choose Muse Glimmer 30B (batch) when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) when you care most about lower input-token price, lower output-token price, and larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) is estimated at $0.28 vs $1.1 for Muse Glimmer 30B (batch), saving $0.82 (74.5% lower).
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) is $0.82 cheaper on the standard workload (74.5% lower).
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) is $0.21 cheaper per 1M input tokens (60% lower; 2.5x difference).
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) is $1.22 cheaper per 1M output tokens (81.3% lower; 5.36x difference).
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) has 917.5K more context (8x larger).
| Feature | Muse Glimmer 30B (batch) (Meta) | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) (DeepSeek) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.35 | $0.14 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $1.5 | $0.28 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $1.1 | $0.28 |
| Context Window | 131.07K | 1.05M |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) is estimated at $0.28 vs $1.1 for Muse Glimmer 30B (batch), saving $0.82 (74.5% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (batch) | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free) can replace Muse Glimmer 30B (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Llama 3.2 3B Instruct (free) can replace Muse Glimmer 30B (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Llama 3.1 8B Instruct can replace Muse Glimmer 30B (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.09.
- Llama 3.2 1B Instruct can replace Muse Glimmer 30B (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.13.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.1 sample workload cost.
- GLM 5.3 Flash offers 1.31M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.08 sample workload cost.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 1.31M context with $0.28 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · DeepSeek · #1
- MiMo-V2.5 · Xiaomi · #2
- Hy3 · Tencent · #3
- Nemotron 3 Ultra (free) · NVIDIA · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsMeta catalog
Review all tracked Meta models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Meta modelsDeepSeek catalog
Check other DeepSeek models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open DeepSeek modelsMuse Glimmer 30B is a dense, open-weight multimodal model from Meta Superintelligence Labs, distilled from Muse Spark and optimized for autonomous agents on consumer hardware. It is suited for long-horizon...
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is a sparse mixture-of-experts model from DeepSeek, with 13B active parameters out of 284B total. This re-post-trained revision is suited for coding, reasoning, and agent workflows....