LFM3-1.7B is $0.02 cheaper per 1M input tokens (20% lower; 1.25x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewLFM3-1.7B vs Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor
Pick LFM3-1.7B for lower cost; pick Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick LFM3-1.7B for lower cost; pick Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, LFM3-1.7B is estimated at $0.18 vs $0.2 for Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor, saving $0.02 (10% lower).
Cost-first pickLFM3-1.7B
Context-first pickMuse Spark 1.2 Contributor
Sample savings$0.0210%
10x traffic gap$0.2
Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor has more context, but LFM3-1.7B saves $0.02 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.2. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
LFM3-1.7B stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | LFM3-1.7B | Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | LFM3-1.7B | $0.5 | $0.6 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | LFM3-1.7B | $0.28 | $0.3 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | LFM3-1.7B | $1.08 | $1.1 |
Both models report the same output price at $0.2 per 1M tokens.
Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor has 786.43K more context (4x larger).
LFM3-1.7B is $0.02 cheaper on the standard workload (10% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
LFM3-1.7B has the lower input price; both models tie on output price; Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, LFM3-1.7B is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.18 for LFM3-1.7B and $0.2 for Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor.
Choose LFM3-1.7B when you care most about lower input-token price.
Choose Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor when you care most about larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, LFM3-1.7B is estimated at $0.18 vs $0.2 for Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor, saving $0.02 (10% lower).
- LFM3-1.7B is $0.02 cheaper on the standard workload (10% lower).
- LFM3-1.7B is $0.02 cheaper per 1M input tokens (20% lower; 1.25x difference).
- Both models report the same output price at $0.2 per 1M tokens.
- Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor has 786.43K more context (4x larger).
| Feature | NewLFM3-1.7B (LiquidAI) | Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor (Meta) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.08 | $0.1 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.2 | $0.2 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.18 | $0.2 |
| Context Window | 262.14K | 1.05M |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | LFM3-1.7B | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, LFM3-1.7B is estimated at $0.18 vs $0.2 for Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor, saving $0.02 (10% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | LFM3-1.7B | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Tie | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- LFM3-1.7B (free) can replace LFM3-1.7B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- LFM2.5-2.6B (free) can replace LFM3-1.7B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) can replace LFM3-1.7B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct (free) can replace LFM3-1.7B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 1.31M context with $0.25 sample workload cost.
- GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch) offers 1.05M context with $0.17 sample workload cost.
- GPT-6 Luna (batch) offers 1.05M context with $0.17 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro · MoonshotAI · #1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 · DeepSeek · #2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · DeepSeek · #3
- GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsLiquidAI catalog
Review all tracked LiquidAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open LiquidAI modelsMeta catalog
Check other Meta models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Meta modelsA compact 1.7B-parameter text model with a 256K-token context, post-trained for agents, tool calling, and structured outputs. It reasons before it answers. Prompts and outputs may be retained and used...
Muse Spark 1.2 contributor tier is a reasoning model from Meta designed for developers who want to start building at an even lower cost. It’s meaningfully cheaper than Muse Spark...