API cost decision in 10 seconds

NewLFM3-1.7B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

Pick LFM3-1.7B for lower cost; pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp only if the larger context window matters more.

Page updated:  Data confirmed:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick LFM3-1.7B for lower cost; pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, LFM3-1.7B is estimated at $0.18 vs $1.1 for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp, saving $0.92 (83.6% lower).

Cost-first pickLFM3-1.7B
Context-first pickDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Sample savings$0.9283.6%
10x traffic gap$9.2

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has more context, but LFM3-1.7B saves $0.92 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $9.2. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

LFM3-1.7B stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickLFM3-1.7BDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputLFM3-1.7B$0.5$2.86
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputLFM3-1.7B$0.28$1.76
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputLFM3-1.7B$1.08$7.04
Cheaper input LFM3-1.7B $0.08 vs $0.44 / 1M

LFM3-1.7B is $0.36 cheaper per 1M input tokens (81.8% lower; 5.5x difference).

Cheaper output LFM3-1.7B $0.2 vs $1.32 / 1M

LFM3-1.7B is $1.12 cheaper per 1M output tokens (84.8% lower; 6.6x difference).

Larger context DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp 262.14K vs 1.05M

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has 786.43K more context (4x larger).

Sample workload LFM3-1.7B $0.18 vs $1.1

LFM3-1.7B is $0.92 cheaper on the standard workload (83.6% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
LFM3-1.7B Calculating… Estimated API cost
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

LFM3-1.7B has the lower input price; LFM3-1.7B has the lower output price; DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, LFM3-1.7B is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.18 for LFM3-1.7B and $1.1 for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp.

Best Fit

Choose LFM3-1.7B when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp when you care most about larger context window.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, LFM3-1.7B is estimated at $0.18 vs $1.1 for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp, saving $0.92 (83.6% lower).
  • LFM3-1.7B is $0.92 cheaper on the standard workload (83.6% lower).
  • LFM3-1.7B is $0.36 cheaper per 1M input tokens (81.8% lower; 5.5x difference).
  • LFM3-1.7B is $1.12 cheaper per 1M output tokens (84.8% lower; 6.6x difference).
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has 786.43K more context (4x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureNewLFM3-1.7B
(LiquidAI)
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
(DeepSeek)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$0.08$0.44
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$0.2$1.32
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$0.18$1.1
Context Window262.14K1.05M
Release Date

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionLFM3-1.7BOn the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, LFM3-1.7B is estimated at $0.18 vs $1.1 for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp, saving $0.92 (83.6% lower).
High-volume input processingLFM3-1.7BLower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsLFM3-1.7BLower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpA larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Larger context near this budget
  • Llama 4 Scout offers 1.31M context with $0.25 sample workload cost.
  • GPT-6 Luna offers 1.05M context with $0.35 sample workload cost.
  • GPT-5.6 Luna offers 1.05M context with $0.8 sample workload cost.
  • GPT-6 Luna Pro offers 1.05M context with $0.35 sample workload cost.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

LiquidAI catalog

Review all tracked LiquidAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open LiquidAI models

DeepSeek catalog

Check other DeepSeek models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open DeepSeek models
LFM3-1.7B

A compact 1.7B-parameter text model with a 256K-token context, post-trained for agents, tool calling, and structured outputs. It reasons before it answers. Prompts and outputs may be retained and used...

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is an experimental vision-enabled version of [DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731](https://openrouter.ai/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731) from DeepSeek, adding image understanding while matching the base model on text capabilities including agents,...