GLM Flash Latest is $0.01 cheaper per 1M input tokens (28% lower; 1.39x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewLFM2.5-24B-A2B vs GLM Flash Latest
Pick LFM2.5-24B-A2B for lower cost; pick GLM Flash Latest only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick LFM2.5-24B-A2B for lower cost; pick GLM Flash Latest only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, LFM2.5-24B-A2B is estimated at $0.4 vs $0.49 for GLM Flash Latest, saving $0.09 (17.7% lower).
Cost-first pickLFM2.5-24B-A2B
Context-first pickGLM Flash Latest
Sample savings$0.0917.7%
10x traffic gap$0.86
GLM Flash Latest has more context, but LFM2.5-24B-A2B saves $0.09 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.86. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
LFM2.5-24B-A2B stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | GLM Flash Latest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | $0.6 | $0.63 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | $0.75 | $0.94 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | $3.55 | $4.54 |
LFM2.5-24B-A2B is $0.2 cheaper per 1M output tokens (22.2% lower; 1.29x difference).
GLM Flash Latest has 920.58K more context (8.19x larger).
LFM2.5-24B-A2B is $0.09 cheaper on the standard workload (17.7% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
GLM Flash Latest has the lower input price; LFM2.5-24B-A2B has the lower output price; GLM Flash Latest offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, LFM2.5-24B-A2B is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.4 for LFM2.5-24B-A2B and $0.49 for GLM Flash Latest.
Choose LFM2.5-24B-A2B when you care most about lower output-token price.
Choose GLM Flash Latest when you care most about lower input-token price, and larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, LFM2.5-24B-A2B is estimated at $0.4 vs $0.49 for GLM Flash Latest, saving $0.09 (17.7% lower).
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B is $0.09 cheaper on the standard workload (17.7% lower).
- GLM Flash Latest is $0.01 cheaper per 1M input tokens (28% lower; 1.39x difference).
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B is $0.2 cheaper per 1M output tokens (22.2% lower; 1.29x difference).
- GLM Flash Latest has 920.58K more context (8.19x larger).
| Feature | NewLFM2.5-24B-A2B (LiquidAI) | GLM Flash Latest (Z.ai) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.05 | $0.036 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.7 | $0.9 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.4 | $0.49 |
| Context Window | 128K | 1.05M |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, LFM2.5-24B-A2B is estimated at $0.4 vs $0.49 for GLM Flash Latest, saving $0.09 (17.7% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | GLM Flash Latest | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | GLM Flash Latest | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- LFM2.5-2.6B (free) can replace LFM2.5-24B-A2B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) can replace LFM2.5-24B-A2B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct (free) can replace LFM2.5-24B-A2B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- LFM2-24B-A2B can replace LFM2.5-24B-A2B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.09.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 1.31M context with $0.47 sample workload cost.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.28 sample workload cost.
- GPT-6 Luna offers 1.05M context with $0.35 sample workload cost.
- GPT-6 Luna Pro offers 1.05M context with $0.35 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Step 5 Preview · StepFun · #2
- GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #3
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash · Xiaomi · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsLiquidAI catalog
Review all tracked LiquidAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open LiquidAI modelsZ.ai catalog
Check other Z.ai models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Z.ai modelsLFM2.5-24B-A2B is a mixture-of-experts reasoning model from Liquid AI with 24B total and 2.45B active parameters. It always reasons before answering and is built for agents that call tools. Liquid...
This model always redirects to the latest model in the GLM Flash family.