API cost decision in 10 seconds

NewLFM2.5-24B-A2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free)

Pick Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) when budget and context both matter.

Page updated:  Data confirmed:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) when budget and context both matter.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) is estimated at $0 vs $0.4 for LFM2.5-24B-A2B, saving $0.4 (100% lower).

Cost-first pickNemotron 3.5 Lightning (free)
Context-first pickNemotron 3.5 Lightning (free)
Sample savings$0.4100%
10x traffic gap$4

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $4. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickLFM2.5-24B-A2BNemotron 3.5 Lightning (free)
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputNemotron 3.5 Lightning (free)$0.6$0
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputNemotron 3.5 Lightning (free)$0.75$0
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputNemotron 3.5 Lightning (free)$3.55$0
Cheaper input Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) $0.05 vs $0 / 1M

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) is free for input tokens while LFM2.5-24B-A2B costs $0.05 per 1M tokens.

Cheaper output Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) $0.7 vs $0 / 1M

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) is free for output tokens while LFM2.5-24B-A2B costs $0.7 per 1M tokens.

Larger context Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) 128K vs 1M

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) has 872K more context (7.81x larger).

Sample workload Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) $0.4 vs $0

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) is free for the standard workload while the other model is estimated at $0.4.

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
LFM2.5-24B-A2B Calculating… Estimated API cost
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) has the lower input price; Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) has the lower output price; Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.4 for LFM2.5-24B-A2B and $0 for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free).

Best Fit

Choose LFM2.5-24B-A2B when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.

Choose Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) when you care most about lower input-token price, lower output-token price, and larger context window.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) is estimated at $0 vs $0.4 for LFM2.5-24B-A2B, saving $0.4 (100% lower).
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) is free for the standard workload while the other model is estimated at $0.4.
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) is free for input tokens while LFM2.5-24B-A2B costs $0.05 per 1M tokens.
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) is free for output tokens while LFM2.5-24B-A2B costs $0.7 per 1M tokens.
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) has 872K more context (7.81x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureNewLFM2.5-24B-A2B
(LiquidAI)
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free)
(NVIDIA)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$0.05$0
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$0.7$0
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$0.4$0
Context Window128K1M
Release Date

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionNemotron 3.5 Lightning (free)On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) is estimated at $0 vs $0.4 for LFM2.5-24B-A2B, saving $0.4 (100% lower).
High-volume input processingNemotron 3.5 Lightning (free)Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsNemotron 3.5 Lightning (free)Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workNemotron 3.5 Lightning (free)A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
Larger context near this budget
  • Llama 4 Scout offers 1.31M context with $0.47 sample workload cost.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.28 sample workload cost.
  • GPT-6 Luna offers 1.05M context with $0.35 sample workload cost.
  • GPT-6 Luna Pro offers 1.05M context with $0.35 sample workload cost.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

LiquidAI catalog

Review all tracked LiquidAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open LiquidAI models

NVIDIA catalog

Check other NVIDIA models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open NVIDIA models
LFM2.5-24B-A2B

LFM2.5-24B-A2B is a mixture-of-experts reasoning model from Liquid AI with 24B total and 2.45B active parameters. It always reasons before answering and is built for agents that call tools. Liquid...

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free)

NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is an open mixture-of-experts model from NVIDIA, with 3B active parameters out of 30B total. It is suited for high-throughput agentic workloads and specialized tasks that...