LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) is free for input tokens while Relace Search costs $1 per 1M tokens.
API cost decision in 10 seconds
LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) vs Relace Search
Pick LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) for lower cost; pick Relace Search only if the larger context window matters more.
Pricing data updated:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) for lower cost; pick Relace Search only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) is estimated at $0 vs $2.5 for Relace Search, saving $2.5 (100% lower).
Cost-first pickLFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free)
Context-first pickRelace Search
Sample savings$2.5100%
10x traffic gap$25
Relace Search has more context, but LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) saves $2.5 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $25. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) | Relace Search |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) | $0 | $6.5 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) | $0 | $4 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) | $0 | $16 |
LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) is free for output tokens while Relace Search costs $3 per 1M tokens.
Relace Search has 223.23K more context (7.81x larger).
LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) is free for the standard workload while the other model is estimated at $2.5.
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) has the lower input price; LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) has the lower output price; Relace Search offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0 for LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) and $2.5 for Relace Search.
Choose LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
Choose Relace Search when you care most about larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) is estimated at $0 vs $2.5 for Relace Search, saving $2.5 (100% lower).
- LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) is free for the standard workload while the other model is estimated at $2.5.
- LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) is free for input tokens while Relace Search costs $1 per 1M tokens.
- LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) is free for output tokens while Relace Search costs $3 per 1M tokens.
- Relace Search has 223.23K more context (7.81x larger).
| Feature | LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) (LiquidAI) | Relace Search (Relace) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0 | $1 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0 | $3 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0 | $2.5 |
| Context Window | 32.77K | 256K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) is estimated at $0 vs $2.5 for Relace Search, saving $2.5 (100% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Relace Search | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Relace Apply 3 can replace Relace Search when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.48.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite offers 1.05M context with $1 sample workload cost.
- No popular competitor is currently available.
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsLiquidAI catalog
Review all tracked LiquidAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open LiquidAI modelsRelace catalog
Check other Relace models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Relace modelsLFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking is a lightweight reasoning-focused model optimized for agentic tasks, data extraction, and RAG—while still running comfortably on edge devices. It supports long context (up to 32K tokens) and is...
The relace-search model uses 4-12 `view_file` and `grep` tools in parallel to explore a codebase and return relevant files to the user request. In contrast to RAG, relace-search performs agentic...