LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) is free for input tokens while Sonar Pro Search costs $3 per 1M tokens.
API cost decision in 10 seconds
LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) vs Sonar Pro Search
Pick LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) for lower cost; pick Sonar Pro Search only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) for lower cost; pick Sonar Pro Search only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) is estimated at $0 vs $10.5 for Sonar Pro Search, saving $10.5 (100% lower).
Cost-first pickLFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free)
Context-first pickSonar Pro Search
Sample savings$10.5100%
10x traffic gap$105
Sonar Pro Search has more context, but LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) saves $10.5 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $105. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) | Sonar Pro Search |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) | $0 | $22.5 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) | $0 | $18 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) | $0 | $78 |
LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) is free for output tokens while Sonar Pro Search costs $15 per 1M tokens.
Sonar Pro Search has 167.23K more context (6.1x larger).
LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) is free for the standard workload while the other model is estimated at $10.5.
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) has the lower input price; LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) has the lower output price; Sonar Pro Search offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0 for LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) and $10.5 for Sonar Pro Search.
Choose LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
Choose Sonar Pro Search when you care most about larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) is estimated at $0 vs $10.5 for Sonar Pro Search, saving $10.5 (100% lower).
- LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) is free for the standard workload while the other model is estimated at $10.5.
- LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) is free for input tokens while Sonar Pro Search costs $3 per 1M tokens.
- LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) is free for output tokens while Sonar Pro Search costs $15 per 1M tokens.
- Sonar Pro Search has 167.23K more context (6.1x larger).
| Feature | LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) (LiquidAI) | Sonar Pro Search (Perplexity) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0 | $3 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0 | $15 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0 | $10.5 |
| Context Window | 32.77K | 200K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) is estimated at $0 vs $10.5 for Sonar Pro Search, saving $10.5 (100% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Sonar Pro Search | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Sonar can replace Sonar Pro Search when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.5.
- Sonar Reasoning Pro can replace Sonar Pro Search when lower sample workload cost matters most: $6.
- Sonar Deep Research can replace Sonar Pro Search when lower sample workload cost matters most: $6.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- GPT-5.4 offers 1.05M context with $10 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsLiquidAI catalog
Review all tracked LiquidAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open LiquidAI modelsPerplexity catalog
Check other Perplexity models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Perplexity modelsLFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking is a lightweight reasoning-focused model optimized for agentic tasks, data extraction, and RAG—while still running comfortably on edge devices. It supports long context (up to 32K tokens) and is...
Exclusively available on the OpenRouter API, Sonar Pro's new Pro Search mode is Perplexity's most advanced agentic search system. It is designed for deeper reasoning and analysis. Pricing is based...