Ling-3.0-flash is $0.1 cheaper per 1M input tokens (83.2% lower; 5.95x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
Ling-3.0-flash vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch)
Pick Ling-3.0-flash for lower cost; pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Ling-3.0-flash for lower cost; pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Ling-3.0-flash is estimated at $0.05 vs $0.5 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch), saving $0.45 (89.5% lower).
Cost-first pickLing-3.0-flash
Context-first pickGemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch)
Sample savings$0.4589.5%
10x traffic gap$4.47
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) has more context, but Ling-3.0-flash saves $0.45 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $4.47. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Ling-3.0-flash stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Ling-3.0-flash | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Ling-3.0-flash | $0.14 | $1 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Ling-3.0-flash | $0.08 | $0.88 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Ling-3.0-flash | $0.34 | $3.88 |
Ling-3.0-flash is $0.69 cheaper per 1M output tokens (91.6% lower; 11.9x difference).
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) has 786.43K more context (4x larger).
Ling-3.0-flash is $0.45 cheaper on the standard workload (89.5% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Ling-3.0-flash has the lower input price; Ling-3.0-flash has the lower output price; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Ling-3.0-flash is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.05 for Ling-3.0-flash and $0.5 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch).
Choose Ling-3.0-flash when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
Choose Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) when you care most about larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Ling-3.0-flash is estimated at $0.05 vs $0.5 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch), saving $0.45 (89.5% lower).
- Ling-3.0-flash is $0.45 cheaper on the standard workload (89.5% lower).
- Ling-3.0-flash is $0.1 cheaper per 1M input tokens (83.2% lower; 5.95x difference).
- Ling-3.0-flash is $0.69 cheaper per 1M output tokens (91.6% lower; 11.9x difference).
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) has 786.43K more context (4x larger).
| Feature | Ling-3.0-flash (inclusionAI) | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) (Google) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.021 | $0.125 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.063 | $0.75 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.05 | $0.5 |
| Context Window | 262.14K | 1.05M |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Ling-3.0-flash | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Ling-3.0-flash is estimated at $0.05 vs $0.5 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch), saving $0.45 (89.5% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Ling-3.0-flash | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Ling-3.0-flash | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) can replace Ling-3.0-flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Ling-3.0-flash (free) can replace Ling-3.0-flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Ling-2.6-flash can replace Ling-3.0-flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.03.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) can replace Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.17 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.11 sample workload cost.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 1.31M context with $0.25 sample workload cost.
- MiMo-V2.5 offers 1.05M context with $0.28 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · DeepSeek · #1
- MiMo-V2.5 · Xiaomi · #2
- Hy3 · Tencent · #3
- Ox Alpha · stealth · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsinclusionAI catalog
Review all tracked inclusionAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open inclusionAI modelsGoogle catalog
Check other Google models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Google models*Ling-3.0-flash* is a *124B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model*, with approximately *5.1B parameters activated per token*. The model is designed with *token efficiency and production-scale agentic inference* as key priorities, enabling developers...
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is Google’s GA high-efficiency multimodal model optimized for low-latency, high-volume workloads. It supports text, image, video, audio, and PDF inputs, and is designed for lightweight agentic...