Hy-MT2-1.8B is $0.02 cheaper per 1M input tokens (26.7% lower; 1.36x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewLing 3.0 Flash VL vs Hy-MT2-1.8B
Pick Hy-MT2-1.8B for lower cost; pick Ling 3.0 Flash VL only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Hy-MT2-1.8B for lower cost; pick Ling 3.0 Flash VL only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Hy-MT2-1.8B is estimated at $0.13 vs $0.15 for Ling 3.0 Flash VL, saving $0.02 (11.7% lower).
Cost-first pickHy-MT2-1.8B
Context-first pickLing 3.0 Flash VL
Sample savings$0.0211.7%
10x traffic gap$0.17
Ling 3.0 Flash VL has more context, but Hy-MT2-1.8B saves $0.02 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.17. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Hy-MT2-1.8B stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Ling 3.0 Flash VL | Hy-MT2-1.8B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Hy-MT2-1.8B | $0.39 | $0.31 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Hy-MT2-1.8B | $0.24 | $0.22 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Hy-MT2-1.8B | $0.96 | $0.93 |
Hy-MT2-1.8B is $0.003 cheaper per 1M output tokens (1.7% lower; 1.02x difference).
Ling 3.0 Flash VL has 122.88K more context (16x larger).
Hy-MT2-1.8B is $0.02 cheaper on the standard workload (11.7% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Hy-MT2-1.8B has the lower input price; Hy-MT2-1.8B has the lower output price; Ling 3.0 Flash VL offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Hy-MT2-1.8B is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.15 for Ling 3.0 Flash VL and $0.13 for Hy-MT2-1.8B.
Choose Ling 3.0 Flash VL when you care most about larger context window.
Choose Hy-MT2-1.8B when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Hy-MT2-1.8B is estimated at $0.13 vs $0.15 for Ling 3.0 Flash VL, saving $0.02 (11.7% lower).
- Hy-MT2-1.8B is $0.02 cheaper on the standard workload (11.7% lower).
- Hy-MT2-1.8B is $0.02 cheaper per 1M input tokens (26.7% lower; 1.36x difference).
- Hy-MT2-1.8B is $0.003 cheaper per 1M output tokens (1.7% lower; 1.02x difference).
- Ling 3.0 Flash VL has 122.88K more context (16x larger).
| Feature | NewLing 3.0 Flash VL (inclusionAI) | Hy-MT2-1.8B (Tencent) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.06 | $0.044 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.18 | $0.177 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.15 | $0.13 |
| Context Window | 131.07K | 8.19K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Hy-MT2-1.8B | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Hy-MT2-1.8B is estimated at $0.13 vs $0.15 for Ling 3.0 Flash VL, saving $0.02 (11.7% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Hy-MT2-1.8B | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Hy-MT2-1.8B | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Ling 3.0 Flash VL | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) can replace Ling 3.0 Flash VL when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) can replace Ling 3.0 Flash VL when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) can replace Ling 3.0 Flash VL when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) can replace Ling 3.0 Flash VL when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.08 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.08 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 offers 1.05M context with $0.13 sample workload cost.
- Hy4 preview · Tencent · #1
- GPT-5.6 Luna · OpenAI · #2
- GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #3
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · DeepSeek · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsinclusionAI catalog
Review all tracked inclusionAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open inclusionAI modelsTencent catalog
Check other Tencent models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Tencent modelsLing 3.0 Flash VL builds on Ling 3.0 Flash (124B total / 5.5B active MoE from InclusionAI), further strengthening its language capabilities while adding native visual perception and advanced visual...
Hy-MT2-1.8B is a compact 1.8B-parameter translation model from Tencent. It supports 33 language pairs and five Chinese dialect and minority-language pairs, with workflows for structured, delimiter-based, contextual, glossary-based, and style-guided...