Ling 3.0 Flash VL is $0.09 cheaper per 1M input tokens (60% lower; 2.5x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewLing 3.0 Flash VL vs NewDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Pick Ling 3.0 Flash VL for lower cost; pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Ling 3.0 Flash VL for lower cost; pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Ling 3.0 Flash VL is estimated at $0.15 vs $0.45 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, saving $0.3 (66.7% lower).
Cost-first pickLing 3.0 Flash VL
Context-first pickDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Sample savings$0.366.7%
10x traffic gap$3
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has more context, but Ling 3.0 Flash VL saves $0.3 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $3. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Ling 3.0 Flash VL stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Ling 3.0 Flash VL | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Ling 3.0 Flash VL | $0.39 | $1.05 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Ling 3.0 Flash VL | $0.24 | $0.75 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Ling 3.0 Flash VL | $0.96 | $3.15 |
Ling 3.0 Flash VL is $0.42 cheaper per 1M output tokens (70% lower; 3.33x difference).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 917.5K more context (8x larger).
Ling 3.0 Flash VL is $0.3 cheaper on the standard workload (66.7% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Ling 3.0 Flash VL has the lower input price; Ling 3.0 Flash VL has the lower output price; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Ling 3.0 Flash VL is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.15 for Ling 3.0 Flash VL and $0.45 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash.
Choose Ling 3.0 Flash VL when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash when you care most about larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Ling 3.0 Flash VL is estimated at $0.15 vs $0.45 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, saving $0.3 (66.7% lower).
- Ling 3.0 Flash VL is $0.3 cheaper on the standard workload (66.7% lower).
- Ling 3.0 Flash VL is $0.09 cheaper per 1M input tokens (60% lower; 2.5x difference).
- Ling 3.0 Flash VL is $0.42 cheaper per 1M output tokens (70% lower; 3.33x difference).
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 917.5K more context (8x larger).
| Feature | NewLing 3.0 Flash VL (inclusionAI) | NewDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (DeepSeek) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.06 | $0.15 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.18 | $0.6 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.15 | $0.45 |
| Context Window | 131.07K | 1.05M |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Ling 3.0 Flash VL | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Ling 3.0 Flash VL is estimated at $0.15 vs $0.45 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, saving $0.3 (66.7% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Ling 3.0 Flash VL | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Ling 3.0 Flash VL | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free) can replace Ling 3.0 Flash VL when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) can replace Ling 3.0 Flash VL when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) can replace Ling 3.0 Flash VL when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) can replace Ling 3.0 Flash VL when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- GLM 5.3 Flash offers 1.31M context with $0.4 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.08 sample workload cost.
- GLM Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.08 sample workload cost.
- Hy4 preview · Tencent · #1
- GPT-5.6 Luna · OpenAI · #2
- GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #3
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · DeepSeek · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsinclusionAI catalog
Review all tracked inclusionAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open inclusionAI modelsDeepSeek catalog
Check other DeepSeek models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open DeepSeek modelsLing 3.0 Flash VL builds on Ling 3.0 Flash (124B total / 5.5B active MoE from InclusionAI), further strengthening its language capabilities while adding native visual perception and advanced visual...
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is a sparse mixture-of-experts model from DeepSeek, and the first built on the company's Causal Encoder-Decoder (CED) architecture. It activates 8B parameters on input and 16B on...