Mercury 2.5 Preview is $0.11 cheaper per 1M input tokens (73.3% lower; 3.75x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewMercury 2.5 Preview vs NewGLM 5.3 Flash (batch)
Pick Mercury 2.5 Preview for lower cost; pick GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Mercury 2.5 Preview for lower cost; pick GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Mercury 2.5 Preview is estimated at $0.11 vs $0.4 for GLM 5.3 Flash (batch), saving $0.29 (71.2% lower).
Cost-first pickMercury 2.5 Preview
Context-first pickGLM 5.3 Flash (batch)
Sample savings$0.2971.2%
10x traffic gap$2.85
GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) has more context, but Mercury 2.5 Preview saves $0.29 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $2.85. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Mercury 2.5 Preview stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Mercury 2.5 Preview | GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Mercury 2.5 Preview | $0.28 | $1 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Mercury 2.5 Preview | $0.19 | $0.65 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Mercury 2.5 Preview | $0.79 | $2.65 |
Mercury 2.5 Preview is $0.35 cheaper per 1M output tokens (70% lower; 3.33x difference).
GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) has 788.58K more context (4.03x larger).
Mercury 2.5 Preview is $0.29 cheaper on the standard workload (71.2% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Mercury 2.5 Preview has the lower input price; Mercury 2.5 Preview has the lower output price; GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Mercury 2.5 Preview is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.11 for Mercury 2.5 Preview and $0.4 for GLM 5.3 Flash (batch).
Choose Mercury 2.5 Preview when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
Choose GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) when you care most about larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Mercury 2.5 Preview is estimated at $0.11 vs $0.4 for GLM 5.3 Flash (batch), saving $0.29 (71.2% lower).
- Mercury 2.5 Preview is $0.29 cheaper on the standard workload (71.2% lower).
- Mercury 2.5 Preview is $0.11 cheaper per 1M input tokens (73.3% lower; 3.75x difference).
- Mercury 2.5 Preview is $0.35 cheaper per 1M output tokens (70% lower; 3.33x difference).
- GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) has 788.58K more context (4.03x larger).
| Feature | NewMercury 2.5 Preview (Inception) | NewGLM 5.3 Flash (batch) (Z.ai) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.04 | $0.15 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.15 | $0.5 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.11 | $0.4 |
| Context Window | 260K | 1.05M |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Mercury 2.5 Preview | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Mercury 2.5 Preview is estimated at $0.11 vs $0.4 for GLM 5.3 Flash (batch), saving $0.29 (71.2% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Mercury 2.5 Preview | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Mercury 2.5 Preview | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- GLM 5.2 (free) can replace GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- GLM 4.5 Air (free) can replace GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- GLM 4 32B can replace GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.15.
- GLM 5.3 Flash can replace GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.2.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.15 sample workload cost.
- GLM 5.3 Flash offers 1.31M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.1 sample workload cost.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 1.31M context with $0.25 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · DeepSeek · #1
- GPT-5.6 Luna · OpenAI · #2
- GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #3
- MiMo-V2.5 · Xiaomi · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsInception catalog
Review all tracked Inception models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Inception modelsZ.ai catalog
Check other Z.ai models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Z.ai modelsMercury 2.5 is the fastest reasoning LLM, and the latest diffusion LLM (dLLM) from Inception. Instead of generating tokens sequentially, Mercury 2.5 produces and refines multiple tokens in parallel, achieving...
GLM-5.3-Flash is a native multimodal model from Z.ai. It is suited for efficient coding and long-horizon agent tasks. Its hybrid sparse and linear attention architecture maintains accurate long-context behavior while...