Mercury 2.5 Preview is $0.11 cheaper per 1M input tokens (73.3% lower; 3.75x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewMercury 2.5 Preview vs Perceptron Mk1
Pick Mercury 2.5 Preview when budget and context both matter.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Mercury 2.5 Preview when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Mercury 2.5 Preview is estimated at $0.11 vs $0.9 for Perceptron Mk1, saving $0.79 (87.2% lower).
Cost-first pickMercury 2.5 Preview
Context-first pickMercury 2.5 Preview
Sample savings$0.7987.2%
10x traffic gap$7.85
Mercury 2.5 Preview is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $7.85. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Mercury 2.5 Preview stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Mercury 2.5 Preview | Perceptron Mk1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Mercury 2.5 Preview | $0.28 | $1.5 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Mercury 2.5 Preview | $0.19 | $1.65 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Mercury 2.5 Preview | $0.79 | $7.65 |
Mercury 2.5 Preview is $1.35 cheaper per 1M output tokens (90% lower; 10x difference).
Mercury 2.5 Preview has 227.23K more context (7.93x larger).
Mercury 2.5 Preview is $0.79 cheaper on the standard workload (87.2% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Mercury 2.5 Preview has the lower input price; Mercury 2.5 Preview has the lower output price; Mercury 2.5 Preview offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Mercury 2.5 Preview is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.11 for Mercury 2.5 Preview and $0.9 for Perceptron Mk1.
Choose Mercury 2.5 Preview when you care most about lower input-token price, lower output-token price, and larger context window.
Choose Perceptron Mk1 when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Mercury 2.5 Preview is estimated at $0.11 vs $0.9 for Perceptron Mk1, saving $0.79 (87.2% lower).
- Mercury 2.5 Preview is $0.79 cheaper on the standard workload (87.2% lower).
- Mercury 2.5 Preview is $0.11 cheaper per 1M input tokens (73.3% lower; 3.75x difference).
- Mercury 2.5 Preview is $1.35 cheaper per 1M output tokens (90% lower; 10x difference).
- Mercury 2.5 Preview has 227.23K more context (7.93x larger).
| Feature | NewMercury 2.5 Preview (Inception) | Perceptron Mk1 (Perceptron) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.04 | $0.15 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.15 | $1.5 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.11 | $0.9 |
| Context Window | 260K | 32.77K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Mercury 2.5 Preview | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Mercury 2.5 Preview is estimated at $0.11 vs $0.9 for Perceptron Mk1, saving $0.79 (87.2% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Mercury 2.5 Preview | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Mercury 2.5 Preview | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Mercury 2.5 Preview | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- No lower-cost same-provider swap is currently tracked for this pair.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.15 sample workload cost.
- GLM 5.3 Flash offers 1.31M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.1 sample workload cost.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 1.31M context with $0.25 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · DeepSeek · #1
- GPT-5.6 Luna · OpenAI · #2
- GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #3
- MiMo-V2.5 · Xiaomi · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsInception catalog
Review all tracked Inception models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Inception modelsPerceptron catalog
Check other Perceptron models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Perceptron modelsMercury 2.5 is the fastest reasoning LLM, and the latest diffusion LLM (dLLM) from Inception. Instead of generating tokens sequentially, Mercury 2.5 produces and refines multiple tokens in parallel, achieving...
Perceptron Mk1 (Mark One) is Perceptron's highest-quality vision-language model for video and embodied reasoning.** It accepts image and video inputs paired with natural language queries, and produces detailed visual understanding...