API cost decision in 10 seconds

NewGranite 4.1 8B vs MiMo-V2-Pro

Pick Granite 4.1 8B for lower cost; pick MiMo-V2-Pro only if the larger context window matters more.

Page updated: 2026-05-26T10:03:26Z Data confirmed: 2026-05-26T12:43:06Z Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Granite 4.1 8B for lower cost; pick MiMo-V2-Pro only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Granite 4.1 8B is estimated at $0.1 vs $2.5 for MiMo-V2-Pro, saving $2.4 (96% lower).

Cost-first pickGranite 4.1 8B

Context-first pickMiMo-V2-Pro

Sample savings$2.496%

10x traffic gap$24

MiMo-V2-Pro has more context, but Granite 4.1 8B saves $2.4 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $24. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Granite 4.1 8B stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shape	Token mix	Better pick	Granite 4.1 8B	MiMo-V2-Pro
Input-heavy / RAG	5M input + 500K output	Granite 4.1 8B	$0.3	$6.5
Balanced workload	1M input + 1M output	Granite 4.1 8B	$0.15	$4
Output-heavy chatbot	1M input + 5M output	Granite 4.1 8B	$0.55	$16

Cheaper input Granite 4.1 8B $0.05 vs $1 / 1M

Granite 4.1 8B is $0.95 cheaper per 1M input tokens (95% lower; 20x difference).

Cheaper output Granite 4.1 8B $0.1 vs $3 / 1M

Granite 4.1 8B is $2.9 cheaper per 1M output tokens (96.7% lower; 30x difference).

Larger context MiMo-V2-Pro 131.07K vs 1.05M

MiMo-V2-Pro has 917.5K more context (8x larger).

Sample workload Granite 4.1 8B $0.1 vs $2.5

Granite 4.1 8B is $2.4 cheaper on the standard workload (96% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.

Monthly input tokens Monthly output tokens

Granite 4.1 8B Calculating… Estimated API cost

MiMo-V2-Pro Calculating… Estimated API cost

Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Granite 4.1 8B has the lower input price; Granite 4.1 8B has the lower output price; MiMo-V2-Pro offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Granite 4.1 8B is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.1 for Granite 4.1 8B and $2.5 for MiMo-V2-Pro.

Best Fit

Choose Granite 4.1 8B when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Choose MiMo-V2-Pro when you care most about larger context window.

Decision Notes

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Granite 4.1 8B is estimated at $0.1 vs $2.5 for MiMo-V2-Pro, saving $2.4 (96% lower).
Granite 4.1 8B is $2.4 cheaper on the standard workload (96% lower).
Granite 4.1 8B is $0.95 cheaper per 1M input tokens (95% lower; 20x difference).
Granite 4.1 8B is $2.9 cheaper per 1M output tokens (96.7% lower; 30x difference).
MiMo-V2-Pro has 917.5K more context (8x larger).

Head-to-Head Specs

Feature	NewGranite 4.1 8B (IBM)	MiMo-V2-Pro (Xiaomi)
Input Price prompt tokens per 1M	$0.05	$1
Completion Price per 1M tokens	$0.1	$3
Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output	$0.1	$2.5
Context Window	131.07K	1.05M
Release Date	2026-04-30	2026-03-18

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use case	Better pick	Why
Budget-constrained production	Granite 4.1 8B	On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Granite 4.1 8B is estimated at $0.1 vs $2.5 for MiMo-V2-Pro, saving $2.4 (96% lower).
High-volume input processing	Granite 4.1 8B	Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbots	Granite 4.1 8B	Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document work	MiMo-V2-Pro	A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps

Granite 4.0 Micro can replace Granite 4.1 8B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.07.
MiMo-V2-Flash can replace MiMo-V2-Pro when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.25.
MiMo-V2.5 can replace MiMo-V2-Pro when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.4.
MiMo-V2-Omni can replace MiMo-V2-Pro when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.4.

Larger context near this budget

Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.

Popular competitors

DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

IBM catalog

Review all tracked IBM models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open IBM models

Xiaomi catalog

Check other Xiaomi models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Xiaomi models

Granite 4.1 8B

Granite 4.1 8B is a dense, decoder-only 8-billion-parameter language model from IBM, part of the Granite 4.1 family. It supports a 131K-token context window and is designed for enterprise tasks...

MiMo-V2-Pro

MiMo-V2-Pro is Xiaomi's flagship foundation model, featuring over 1T total parameters and a 1M context length, deeply optimized for agentic scenarios. It is highly adaptable to general agent frameworks like...