API cost decision in 10 seconds

NewGranite 4.1 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Pick Granite 4.1 8B for lower cost; pick Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B only if the larger context window matters more.

Pricing data updated:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Granite 4.1 8B for lower cost; pick Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Granite 4.1 8B is estimated at $0.1 vs $0.15 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, saving $0.05 (33.3% lower).

Cost-first pickGranite 4.1 8B
Context-first pickNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Sample savings$0.0533.3%
10x traffic gap$0.5

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has more context, but Granite 4.1 8B saves $0.05 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.5. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Granite 4.1 8B stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickGranite 4.1 8BNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputGranite 4.1 8B$0.3$0.35
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputGranite 4.1 8B$0.15$0.25
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputGranite 4.1 8B$0.55$1.05
Cheaper input Tie $0.05 vs $0.05 / 1M

Both models report the same input price at $0.05 per 1M tokens.

Cheaper output Granite 4.1 8B $0.1 vs $0.2 / 1M

Granite 4.1 8B is $0.1 cheaper per 1M output tokens (50% lower; 2x difference).

Larger context Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 131.07K vs 262.14K

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has 131.07K more context (2x larger).

Sample workload Granite 4.1 8B $0.1 vs $0.15

Granite 4.1 8B is $0.05 cheaper on the standard workload (33.3% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
Granite 4.1 8B Calculating… Estimated API cost
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

both models tie on input price; Granite 4.1 8B has the lower output price; Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Granite 4.1 8B is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.1 for Granite 4.1 8B and $0.15 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B.

Best Fit

Choose Granite 4.1 8B when you care most about lower output-token price.

Choose Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B when you care most about larger context window.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Granite 4.1 8B is estimated at $0.1 vs $0.15 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, saving $0.05 (33.3% lower).
  • Granite 4.1 8B is $0.05 cheaper on the standard workload (33.3% lower).
  • Both models report the same input price at $0.05 per 1M tokens.
  • Granite 4.1 8B is $0.1 cheaper per 1M output tokens (50% lower; 2x difference).
  • Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has 131.07K more context (2x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureNewGranite 4.1 8B
(IBM)
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
(NVIDIA)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$0.05$0.05
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$0.1$0.2
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$0.1$0.15
Context Window131.07K262.14K
Release Date

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionGranite 4.1 8BOn the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Granite 4.1 8B is estimated at $0.1 vs $0.15 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, saving $0.05 (33.3% lower).
High-volume input processingTieLower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsGranite 4.1 8BLower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BA larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Popular competitors
  • No popular competitor is currently available.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

IBM catalog

Review all tracked IBM models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open IBM models

NVIDIA catalog

Check other NVIDIA models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open NVIDIA models
Granite 4.1 8B

Granite 4.1 8B is a dense, decoder-only 8-billion-parameter language model from IBM, part of the Granite 4.1 family. It supports a 131K-token context window and is designed for enterprise tasks...

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is a small language MoE model with highest compute efficiency and accuracy for developers to build specialized agentic AI systems. The model is fully...