API cost decision in 10 seconds

Lyria 3 Pro Preview vs Claude Opus 4.5

Pick Lyria 3 Pro Preview when budget and context both matter.

Page updated:  Data confirmed:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Lyria 3 Pro Preview when budget and context both matter.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Lyria 3 Pro Preview is estimated at $0 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus 4.5, saving $17.5 (100% lower).

Cost-first pickLyria 3 Pro Preview
Context-first pickLyria 3 Pro Preview
Sample savings$17.5100%
10x traffic gap$175

Lyria 3 Pro Preview is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $175. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Lyria 3 Pro Preview stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickLyria 3 Pro PreviewClaude Opus 4.5
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputLyria 3 Pro Preview$0$37.5
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputLyria 3 Pro Preview$0$30
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputLyria 3 Pro Preview$0$130
Cheaper input Lyria 3 Pro Preview $0 vs $5 / 1M

Lyria 3 Pro Preview is free for input tokens while Claude Opus 4.5 costs $5 per 1M tokens.

Cheaper output Lyria 3 Pro Preview $0 vs $25 / 1M

Lyria 3 Pro Preview is free for output tokens while Claude Opus 4.5 costs $25 per 1M tokens.

Larger context Lyria 3 Pro Preview 1.05M vs 200K

Lyria 3 Pro Preview has 848.58K more context (5.24x larger).

Sample workload Lyria 3 Pro Preview $0 vs $17.5

Lyria 3 Pro Preview is free for the standard workload while the other model is estimated at $17.5.

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
Lyria 3 Pro Preview Calculating… Estimated API cost
Claude Opus 4.5 Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Lyria 3 Pro Preview has the lower input price; Lyria 3 Pro Preview has the lower output price; Lyria 3 Pro Preview offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Lyria 3 Pro Preview is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0 for Lyria 3 Pro Preview and $17.5 for Claude Opus 4.5.

Best Fit

Choose Lyria 3 Pro Preview when you care most about lower input-token price, lower output-token price, and larger context window.

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Lyria 3 Pro Preview is estimated at $0 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus 4.5, saving $17.5 (100% lower).
  • Lyria 3 Pro Preview is free for the standard workload while the other model is estimated at $17.5.
  • Lyria 3 Pro Preview is free for input tokens while Claude Opus 4.5 costs $5 per 1M tokens.
  • Lyria 3 Pro Preview is free for output tokens while Claude Opus 4.5 costs $25 per 1M tokens.
  • Lyria 3 Pro Preview has 848.58K more context (5.24x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureLyria 3 Pro Preview
(Google)
Claude Opus 4.5
(Anthropic)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$0$5
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$0$25
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$0$17.5
Context Window1.05M200K
Release Date

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionLyria 3 Pro PreviewOn the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Lyria 3 Pro Preview is estimated at $0 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus 4.5, saving $17.5 (100% lower).
High-volume input processingLyria 3 Pro PreviewLower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsLyria 3 Pro PreviewLower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workLyria 3 Pro PreviewA larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
  • Claude 3 Haiku can replace Claude Opus 4.5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.88.
  • Claude 3.5 Haiku can replace Claude Opus 4.5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $2.8.
  • Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest can replace Claude Opus 4.5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $3.5.
  • Claude Haiku 4.5 can replace Claude Opus 4.5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $3.5.
Larger context near this budget
  • Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
  • Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $5 sample workload cost.
  • Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
  • GPT-5.5 offers 1.05M context with $20 sample workload cost.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Google catalog

Review all tracked Google models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Google models

Anthropic catalog

Check other Anthropic models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Anthropic models
Lyria 3 Pro Preview

Full-length songs are priced at $0.08 per song. Lyria 3 is Google's family of music generation models, available through the Gemini API. With Lyria 3, you can generate high-quality, 48kHz...

Claude Opus 4.5

Claude Opus 4.5 is Anthropic’s frontier reasoning model optimized for complex software engineering, agentic workflows, and long-horizon computer use. It offers strong multimodal capabilities, competitive performance across real-world coding and...