Gemma 4 31B is $0.28 cheaper per 1M input tokens (70% lower; 3.33x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
Gemma 4 31B vs MiMo-V2-Omni
Pick Gemma 4 31B when budget is the priority.
Pricing data updated:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Gemma 4 31B when budget is the priority.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemma 4 31B is estimated at $0.3 vs $1.4 for MiMo-V2-Omni, saving $1.09 (78.2% lower).
Cost-first pickGemma 4 31B
Context-first pickBoth models
Sample savings$1.0978.2%
10x traffic gap$10.95
The reported context window is tied, so cost and provider fit carry more weight. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $10.95. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Gemma 4 31B stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Gemma 4 31B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Gemma 4 31B | $0.78 | $3 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Gemma 4 31B | $0.49 | $2.4 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Gemma 4 31B | $1.97 | $10.4 |
Gemma 4 31B is $1.63 cheaper per 1M output tokens (81.5% lower; 5.41x difference).
Both models report the same context window at 262.14K tokens.
Gemma 4 31B is $1.09 cheaper on the standard workload (78.2% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Gemma 4 31B has the lower input price; Gemma 4 31B has the lower output price; both models report the same context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Gemma 4 31B is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.3 for Gemma 4 31B and $1.4 for MiMo-V2-Omni.
Choose Gemma 4 31B when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
Choose MiMo-V2-Omni when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemma 4 31B is estimated at $0.3 vs $1.4 for MiMo-V2-Omni, saving $1.09 (78.2% lower).
- Gemma 4 31B is $1.09 cheaper on the standard workload (78.2% lower).
- Gemma 4 31B is $0.28 cheaper per 1M input tokens (70% lower; 3.33x difference).
- Gemma 4 31B is $1.63 cheaper per 1M output tokens (81.5% lower; 5.41x difference).
- Both models report the same context window at 262.14K tokens.
| Feature | Gemma 4 31B (Google) | MiMo-V2-Omni (Xiaomi) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.12 | $0.4 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.37 | $2 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.3 | $1.4 |
| Context Window | 262.14K | 262.14K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Gemma 4 31B | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemma 4 31B is estimated at $0.3 vs $1.4 for MiMo-V2-Omni, saving $1.09 (78.2% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Gemma 4 31B | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Gemma 4 31B | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Tie | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) can replace Gemma 4 31B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Gemma 4 31B (free) can replace Gemma 4 31B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Lyria 3 Pro Preview can replace Gemma 4 31B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Lyria 3 Clip Preview can replace Gemma 4 31B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite offers 1.05M context with $1 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro offers 1.05M context with $0.87 sample workload cost.
- No popular competitor is currently available.
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsGoogle catalog
Review all tracked Google models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Google modelsXiaomi catalog
Check other Xiaomi models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Xiaomi modelsGemma 4 31B Instruct is Google DeepMind's 30.7B dense multimodal model supporting text and image input with text output. Features a 256K token context window, configurable thinking/reasoning mode, native function...
MiMo-V2-Omni is a frontier omni-modal model that natively processes image, video, and audio inputs within a unified architecture. It combines strong multimodal perception with agentic capability - visual grounding, multi-step...