gpt-oss-safeguard-20b is $0.04 cheaper per 1M input tokens (37.5% lower; 1.6x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
Gemma 4 31B vs gpt-oss-safeguard-20b
Pick gpt-oss-safeguard-20b for lower cost; pick Gemma 4 31B only if the larger context window matters more.
Pricing data updated:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick gpt-oss-safeguard-20b for lower cost; pick Gemma 4 31B only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, gpt-oss-safeguard-20b is estimated at $0.22 vs $0.3 for Gemma 4 31B, saving $0.08 (26.2% lower).
Cost-first pickgpt-oss-safeguard-20b
Context-first pickGemma 4 31B
Sample savings$0.0826.2%
10x traffic gap$0.8
Gemma 4 31B has more context, but gpt-oss-safeguard-20b saves $0.08 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.8. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
gpt-oss-safeguard-20b stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Gemma 4 31B | gpt-oss-safeguard-20b |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | gpt-oss-safeguard-20b | $0.78 | $0.53 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | gpt-oss-safeguard-20b | $0.49 | $0.38 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | gpt-oss-safeguard-20b | $1.97 | $1.57 |
gpt-oss-safeguard-20b is $0.07 cheaper per 1M output tokens (18.9% lower; 1.23x difference).
Gemma 4 31B has 131.07K more context (2x larger).
gpt-oss-safeguard-20b is $0.08 cheaper on the standard workload (26.2% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
gpt-oss-safeguard-20b has the lower input price; gpt-oss-safeguard-20b has the lower output price; Gemma 4 31B offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, gpt-oss-safeguard-20b is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.3 for Gemma 4 31B and $0.22 for gpt-oss-safeguard-20b.
Choose Gemma 4 31B when you care most about larger context window.
Choose gpt-oss-safeguard-20b when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, gpt-oss-safeguard-20b is estimated at $0.22 vs $0.3 for Gemma 4 31B, saving $0.08 (26.2% lower).
- gpt-oss-safeguard-20b is $0.08 cheaper on the standard workload (26.2% lower).
- gpt-oss-safeguard-20b is $0.04 cheaper per 1M input tokens (37.5% lower; 1.6x difference).
- gpt-oss-safeguard-20b is $0.07 cheaper per 1M output tokens (18.9% lower; 1.23x difference).
- Gemma 4 31B has 131.07K more context (2x larger).
| Feature | Gemma 4 31B (Google) | gpt-oss-safeguard-20b (OpenAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.12 | $0.075 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.37 | $0.3 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.3 | $0.22 |
| Context Window | 262.14K | 131.07K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | gpt-oss-safeguard-20b | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, gpt-oss-safeguard-20b is estimated at $0.22 vs $0.3 for Gemma 4 31B, saving $0.08 (26.2% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | gpt-oss-safeguard-20b | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | gpt-oss-safeguard-20b | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Gemma 4 31B | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) can replace Gemma 4 31B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Gemma 4 31B (free) can replace Gemma 4 31B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Lyria 3 Pro Preview can replace Gemma 4 31B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Lyria 3 Clip Preview can replace Gemma 4 31B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- No popular competitor is currently available.
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsGoogle catalog
Review all tracked Google models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Google modelsOpenAI catalog
Check other OpenAI models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open OpenAI modelsGemma 4 31B Instruct is Google DeepMind's 30.7B dense multimodal model supporting text and image input with text output. Features a 256K token context window, configurable thinking/reasoning mode, native function...
gpt-oss-safeguard-20b is a safety reasoning model from OpenAI built upon gpt-oss-20b. This open-weight, 21B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model offers lower latency for safety tasks like content classification, LLM filtering, and trust...