API cost decision in 10 seconds

Gemma 4 31B vs MiniMax M2-her

Pick Gemma 4 31B when budget and context both matter.

Pricing data updated:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Gemma 4 31B when budget and context both matter.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemma 4 31B is estimated at $0.3 vs $0.9 for MiniMax M2-her, saving $0.59 (66.1% lower).

Cost-first pickGemma 4 31B
Context-first pickGemma 4 31B
Sample savings$0.5966.1%
10x traffic gap$5.95

Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $5.95. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Gemma 4 31B stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickGemma 4 31BMiniMax M2-her
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputGemma 4 31B$0.78$2.1
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputGemma 4 31B$0.49$1.5
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputGemma 4 31B$1.97$6.3
Cheaper input Gemma 4 31B $0.12 vs $0.3 / 1M

Gemma 4 31B is $0.18 cheaper per 1M input tokens (60% lower; 2.5x difference).

Cheaper output Gemma 4 31B $0.37 vs $1.2 / 1M

Gemma 4 31B is $0.83 cheaper per 1M output tokens (69.2% lower; 3.24x difference).

Larger context Gemma 4 31B 262.14K vs 65.54K

Gemma 4 31B has 196.61K more context (4x larger).

Sample workload Gemma 4 31B $0.3 vs $0.9

Gemma 4 31B is $0.59 cheaper on the standard workload (66.1% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
Gemma 4 31B Calculating… Estimated API cost
MiniMax M2-her Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Gemma 4 31B has the lower input price; Gemma 4 31B has the lower output price; Gemma 4 31B offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Gemma 4 31B is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.3 for Gemma 4 31B and $0.9 for MiniMax M2-her.

Best Fit

Choose Gemma 4 31B when you care most about lower input-token price, lower output-token price, and larger context window.

Choose MiniMax M2-her when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemma 4 31B is estimated at $0.3 vs $0.9 for MiniMax M2-her, saving $0.59 (66.1% lower).
  • Gemma 4 31B is $0.59 cheaper on the standard workload (66.1% lower).
  • Gemma 4 31B is $0.18 cheaper per 1M input tokens (60% lower; 2.5x difference).
  • Gemma 4 31B is $0.83 cheaper per 1M output tokens (69.2% lower; 3.24x difference).
  • Gemma 4 31B has 196.61K more context (4x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureGemma 4 31B
(Google)
MiniMax M2-her
(MiniMax)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$0.12$0.3
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$0.37$1.2
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$0.3$0.9
Context Window262.14K65.54K
Release Date

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionGemma 4 31BOn the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemma 4 31B is estimated at $0.3 vs $0.9 for MiniMax M2-her, saving $0.59 (66.1% lower).
High-volume input processingGemma 4 31BLower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsGemma 4 31BLower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workGemma 4 31BA larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
Larger context near this budget
Popular competitors
  • No popular competitor is currently available.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Google catalog

Review all tracked Google models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Google models

MiniMax catalog

Check other MiniMax models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open MiniMax models
Gemma 4 31B

Gemma 4 31B Instruct is Google DeepMind's 30.7B dense multimodal model supporting text and image input with text output. Features a 256K token context window, configurable thinking/reasoning mode, native function...

MiniMax M2-her

MiniMax M2-her is a dialogue-first large language model built for immersive roleplay, character-driven chat, and expressive multi-turn conversations. Designed to stay consistent in tone and personality, it supports rich message...