API cost decision in 10 seconds

🔥Gemma 4 31B vs 🔥Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

Pick Gemma 4 31B for lower cost; pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview only if the larger context window matters more.

Pricing data updated:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Gemma 4 31B for lower cost; pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemma 4 31B is estimated at $0.3 vs $1 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview, saving $0.7 (69.5% lower).

Cost-first pickGemma 4 31B
Context-first pickGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Sample savings$0.769.5%
10x traffic gap$6.95

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has more context, but Gemma 4 31B saves $0.7 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $6.95. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cheaper input Gemma 4 31B $0.12 vs $0.25 / 1M

Gemma 4 31B is $0.13 cheaper per 1M input tokens (52% lower; 2.08x difference).

Cheaper output Gemma 4 31B $0.37 vs $1.5 / 1M

Gemma 4 31B is $1.13 cheaper per 1M output tokens (75.3% lower; 4.05x difference).

Larger context Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 262.14K vs 1.05M

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has 786.43K more context (4x larger).

Sample workload Gemma 4 31B $0.3 vs $1

Gemma 4 31B is $0.7 cheaper on the standard workload (69.5% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
Gemma 4 31B Calculating… Estimated API cost
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Gemma 4 31B has the lower input price; Gemma 4 31B has the lower output price; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Gemma 4 31B is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.3 for Gemma 4 31B and $1 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview.

Best Fit

Choose Gemma 4 31B when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Choose Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview when you care most about larger context window.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemma 4 31B is estimated at $0.3 vs $1 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview, saving $0.7 (69.5% lower).
  • Gemma 4 31B is $0.7 cheaper on the standard workload (69.5% lower).
  • Gemma 4 31B is $0.13 cheaper per 1M input tokens (52% lower; 2.08x difference).
  • Gemma 4 31B is $1.13 cheaper per 1M output tokens (75.3% lower; 4.05x difference).
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has 786.43K more context (4x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
Feature🔥Gemma 4 31B
(Google)
🔥Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
(Google)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$0.12$0.25
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$0.37$1.5
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$0.3$1
Context Window262.14K1.05M
Release Date
Popularity Rank
current rank
#18#19

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionGemma 4 31BOn the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemma 4 31B is estimated at $0.3 vs $1 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview, saving $0.7 (69.5% lower).
High-volume input processingGemma 4 31BLower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsGemma 4 31BLower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewA larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
Larger context near this budget
  • Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
  • Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models ranked by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Google catalog

Review all tracked Google models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Google models
Gemma 4 31B

Gemma 4 31B Instruct is Google DeepMind's 30.7B dense multimodal model supporting text and image input with text output. Features a 256K token context window, configurable thinking/reasoning mode, native function...

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview is Google's high-efficiency model optimized for high-volume use cases. It outperforms Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite on overall quality and approaches Gemini 2.5 Flash performance across...