Gemini 2.0 Flash is $0.02 cheaper per 1M input tokens (16.7% lower; 1.2x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
Gemma 4 31B vs Gemini 2.0 Flash
Pick Gemini 2.0 Flash when budget and context both matter.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Gemini 2.0 Flash when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemini 2.0 Flash is estimated at $0.3 vs $0.3 for Gemma 4 31B, saving $0.005 (1.6% lower).
Cost-first pickGemini 2.0 Flash
Context-first pickGemini 2.0 Flash
Sample savings$0.0051.6%
10x traffic gap$0.05
Gemini 2.0 Flash is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.05. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors Gemini 2.0 Flash, balanced workload favors Gemma 4 31B, and output-heavy chatbot favors Gemma 4 31B.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Gemma 4 31B | Gemini 2.0 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Gemini 2.0 Flash | $0.78 | $0.7 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Gemma 4 31B | $0.49 | $0.5 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Gemma 4 31B | $1.97 | $2.1 |
Gemma 4 31B is $0.03 cheaper per 1M output tokens (7.5% lower; 1.08x difference).
Gemini 2.0 Flash has 737.86K more context (3.81x larger).
Gemini 2.0 Flash is $0.005 cheaper on the standard workload (1.6% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Gemini 2.0 Flash has the lower input price; Gemma 4 31B has the lower output price; Gemini 2.0 Flash offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Gemini 2.0 Flash is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.3 for Gemma 4 31B and $0.3 for Gemini 2.0 Flash.
Choose Gemma 4 31B when you care most about lower output-token price.
Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash when you care most about lower input-token price, and larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemini 2.0 Flash is estimated at $0.3 vs $0.3 for Gemma 4 31B, saving $0.005 (1.6% lower).
- Gemini 2.0 Flash is $0.005 cheaper on the standard workload (1.6% lower).
- Gemini 2.0 Flash is $0.02 cheaper per 1M input tokens (16.7% lower; 1.2x difference).
- Gemma 4 31B is $0.03 cheaper per 1M output tokens (7.5% lower; 1.08x difference).
- Gemini 2.0 Flash has 737.86K more context (3.81x larger).
| Feature | Gemma 4 31B (Google) | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Google) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.12 | $0.1 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.37 | $0.4 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.3 | $0.3 |
| Context Window | 262.14K | 1M |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #27 | #46 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Gemini 2.0 Flash | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemini 2.0 Flash is estimated at $0.3 vs $0.3 for Gemma 4 31B, saving $0.005 (1.6% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Gemini 2.0 Flash | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Gemma 4 31B | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Gemini 2.0 Flash | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Gemma 4 31B (free) can replace Gemma 4 31B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) can replace Gemma 4 31B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Lyria 3 Clip Preview can replace Gemma 4 31B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Lyria 3 Pro Preview can replace Gemma 4 31B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite offers 1.05M context with $0.3 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsGoogle catalog
Review all tracked Google models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Google modelsGemma 4 31B Instruct is Google DeepMind's 30.7B dense multimodal model supporting text and image input with text output. Features a 256K token context window, configurable thinking/reasoning mode, native function...
Gemini Flash 2.0 offers a significantly faster time to first token (TTFT) compared to [Gemini Flash 1.5](/google/gemini-flash-1.5), while maintaining quality on par with larger models like [Gemini Pro 1.5](/google/gemini-pro-1.5). It...