API cost decision in 10 seconds

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Ministral 3 8B 2512

The standard workload cost is tied; choose by context window, provider fit, latency, or model quality.

Page updated: 2026-05-26T10:03:26Z Data confirmed: 2026-05-26T13:08:02Z Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

The standard workload cost is tied; choose by context window, provider fit, latency, or model quality.

Both models are estimated at $0.23 for the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Cost-first pickTie

Context-first pickBoth models

Sample savings$00%

10x traffic gap$0

Context-window winner: Both models. Cost does not separate this pair on the standard workload, so the next decision point is context window and model behavior.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors Gemma 4 26B A4B, balanced workload favors Ministral 3 8B 2512, and output-heavy chatbot favors Ministral 3 8B 2512.

Workload shape	Token mix	Better pick	Gemma 4 26B A4B	Ministral 3 8B 2512
Input-heavy / RAG	5M input + 500K output	Gemma 4 26B A4B	$0.46	$0.82
Balanced workload	1M input + 1M output	Ministral 3 8B 2512	$0.39	$0.3
Output-heavy chatbot	1M input + 5M output	Ministral 3 8B 2512	$1.71	$0.9

Cheaper input Gemma 4 26B A4B $0.06 vs $0.15 / 1M

Gemma 4 26B A4B is $0.09 cheaper per 1M input tokens (60% lower; 2.5x difference).

Cheaper output Ministral 3 8B 2512 $0.33 vs $0.15 / 1M

Ministral 3 8B 2512 is $0.18 cheaper per 1M output tokens (54.5% lower; 2.2x difference).

Larger context Tie 262.14K vs 262.14K

Both models report the same context window at 262.14K tokens.

Sample workload Ministral 3 8B 2512 $0.23 vs $0.22

Ministral 3 8B 2512 is $0 cheaper on the standard workload (0% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.

Monthly input tokens Monthly output tokens

Gemma 4 26B A4B Calculating… Estimated API cost

Ministral 3 8B 2512 Calculating… Estimated API cost

Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Gemma 4 26B A4B has the lower input price; Ministral 3 8B 2512 has the lower output price; both models report the same context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Ministral 3 8B 2512 is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.23 for Gemma 4 26B A4B and $0.22 for Ministral 3 8B 2512.

Best Fit

Choose Gemma 4 26B A4B when you care most about lower input-token price.

Choose Ministral 3 8B 2512 when you care most about lower output-token price.

Decision Notes

Both models are estimated at $0.23 for the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Ministral 3 8B 2512 is $0 cheaper on the standard workload (0% lower).
Gemma 4 26B A4B is $0.09 cheaper per 1M input tokens (60% lower; 2.5x difference).
Ministral 3 8B 2512 is $0.18 cheaper per 1M output tokens (54.5% lower; 2.2x difference).
Both models report the same context window at 262.14K tokens.

Head-to-Head Specs

Feature	Gemma 4 26B A4B (Google)	Ministral 3 8B 2512 (Mistral)
Input Price prompt tokens per 1M	$0.06	$0.15
Completion Price per 1M tokens	$0.33	$0.15
Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output	$0.23	$0.22
Context Window	262.14K	262.14K
Release Date	2026-04-03	2025-12-02

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use case	Better pick	Why
Budget-constrained production	Tie	Both models are estimated at $0.23 for the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
High-volume input processing	Gemma 4 26B A4B	Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbots	Ministral 3 8B 2512	Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document work	Tie	A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps

Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) can replace Gemma 4 26B A4B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
Gemma 4 31B (free) can replace Gemma 4 26B A4B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
Lyria 3 Pro Preview can replace Gemma 4 26B A4B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
Lyria 3 Clip Preview can replace Gemma 4 26B A4B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.

Larger context near this budget

Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.

Popular competitors

DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Google catalog

Review all tracked Google models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Google models

Mistral catalog

Check other Mistral models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Mistral models

Gemma 4 26B A4B

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is an instruction-tuned Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model from Google DeepMind. Despite 25.2B total parameters, only 3.8B activate per token during inference — delivering near-31B quality at...

Ministral 3 8B 2512

A balanced model in the Ministral 3 family, Ministral 3 8B is a powerful, efficient tiny language model with vision capabilities.