API cost decision in 10 seconds

NewGemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs Fugu Max

Pick Fugu Max when budget and context both matter.

Page updated: 2026-11-05T18:07:28Z Data confirmed: 2026-11-05T20:07:24Z Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Fugu Max when budget and context both matter.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Fugu Max is estimated at $5 vs $6 for Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash, saving $1 (16.7% lower).

Cost-first pickFugu Max

Context-first pickFugu Max

Sample savings$116.7%

10x traffic gap$10

Fugu Max is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $10. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash, balanced workload favors Fugu Max, and output-heavy chatbot favors Fugu Max.

Workload shape	Token mix	Better pick	Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash	Fugu Max
Input-heavy / RAG	5M input + 500K output	Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash	$12	$13
Balanced workload	1M input + 1M output	Fugu Max	$10.5	$8
Output-heavy chatbot	1M input + 5M output	Fugu Max	$46.5	$32

Cheaper input Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash $1.5 vs $2 / 1M

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash is $0.5 cheaper per 1M input tokens (25% lower; 1.33x difference).

Cheaper output Fugu Max $9 vs $6 / 1M

Fugu Max is $3 cheaper per 1M output tokens (33.3% lower; 1.5x difference).

Larger context Fugu Max 131.07K vs 1M

Fugu Max has 868.93K more context (7.63x larger).

Sample workload Fugu Max $6 vs $5

Fugu Max is $1 cheaper on the standard workload (16.7% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.

Monthly input tokens Monthly output tokens

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash Calculating… Estimated API cost

Fugu Max Calculating… Estimated API cost

Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash has the lower input price; Fugu Max has the lower output price; Fugu Max offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Fugu Max is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $6 for Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash and $5 for Fugu Max.

Best Fit

Choose Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash when you care most about lower input-token price.

Choose Fugu Max when you care most about lower output-token price, and larger context window.

Decision Notes

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Fugu Max is estimated at $5 vs $6 for Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash, saving $1 (16.7% lower).
Fugu Max is $1 cheaper on the standard workload (16.7% lower).
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash is $0.5 cheaper per 1M input tokens (25% lower; 1.33x difference).
Fugu Max is $3 cheaper per 1M output tokens (33.3% lower; 1.5x difference).
Fugu Max has 868.93K more context (7.63x larger).

Head-to-Head Specs

Feature	NewGemini Omni 1.2 Flash (Google)	Fugu Max (Sakana)
Input Price prompt tokens per 1M	$1.5	$2
Completion Price per 1M tokens	$9	$6
Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output	$6	$5
Context Window	131.07K	1M
Release Date	2026-11-05	2026-09-11

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use case	Better pick	Why
Budget-constrained production	Fugu Max	On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Fugu Max is estimated at $5 vs $6 for Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash, saving $1 (16.7% lower).
High-volume input processing	Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash	Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbots	Fugu Max	Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document work	Fugu Max	A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps

Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) can replace Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
Gemma 4 31B (free) can replace Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
Lyria 3 Pro Preview can replace Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
Lyria 3 Clip Preview can replace Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.

Larger context near this budget

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
Llama 4 Scout offers 1.31M context with $0.25 sample workload cost.
GPT-6 Luna offers 1.05M context with $0.35 sample workload cost.

Popular competitors

Kimi K3.1 Pro · MoonshotAI · #1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 · DeepSeek · #2
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · DeepSeek · #3
GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #4

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Google catalog

Review all tracked Google models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Google models

Sakana catalog

Check other Sakana models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Sakana models

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash is Google's native multimodal video generation and editing model, the successor to Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash. It generates clips up to 15 seconds long with native...

Fugu Max

Fugu Max is the cost-performance model in Sakana AI's Fugu family. Rather than a single monolithic model, Fugu is a learned multi-agent orchestration system: a language model trained to route...