Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is $1 cheaper per 1M input tokens (40% lower; 1.67x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewGemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Pareto 26.9
Pick Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash for lower cost; pick Pareto 26.9 only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash for lower cost; pick Pareto 26.9 only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is estimated at $6 vs $6.25 for Pareto 26.9, saving $0.25 (4% lower).
Cost-first pickGemini Omni 1.1 Flash
Context-first pickPareto 26.9
Sample savings$0.254%
10x traffic gap$2.5
Pareto 26.9 has more context, but Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash saves $0.25 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $2.5. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash, balanced workload favors Pareto 26.9, and output-heavy chatbot favors Pareto 26.9.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash | Pareto 26.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash | $12 | $16.25 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Pareto 26.9 | $10.5 | $10 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Pareto 26.9 | $46.5 | $40 |
Pareto 26.9 is $1.5 cheaper per 1M output tokens (16.7% lower; 1.2x difference).
Pareto 26.9 has 131.07K more context (2x larger).
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is $0.25 cheaper on the standard workload (4% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash has the lower input price; Pareto 26.9 has the lower output price; Pareto 26.9 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $6 for Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash and $6.25 for Pareto 26.9.
Choose Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash when you care most about lower input-token price.
Choose Pareto 26.9 when you care most about lower output-token price, and larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is estimated at $6 vs $6.25 for Pareto 26.9, saving $0.25 (4% lower).
- Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is $0.25 cheaper on the standard workload (4% lower).
- Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is $1 cheaper per 1M input tokens (40% lower; 1.67x difference).
- Pareto 26.9 is $1.5 cheaper per 1M output tokens (16.7% lower; 1.2x difference).
- Pareto 26.9 has 131.07K more context (2x larger).
| Feature | NewGemini Omni 1.1 Flash (Google) | Pareto 26.9 (unbiased) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $1.5 | $2.5 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $9 | $7.5 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $6 | $6.25 |
| Context Window | 131.07K | 262.14K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is estimated at $6 vs $6.25 for Pareto 26.9, saving $0.25 (4% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Pareto 26.9 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Pareto 26.9 | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) can replace Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Gemma 4 31B (free) can replace Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Lyria 3 Pro Preview can replace Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Lyria 3 Clip Preview can replace Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 1.31M context with $0.25 sample workload cost.
- GPT-6 Luna offers 1.05M context with $0.35 sample workload cost.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro · MoonshotAI · #1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 · DeepSeek · #2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · DeepSeek · #3
- GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsGoogle catalog
Review all tracked Google models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Google modelsunbiased catalog
Check other unbiased models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open unbiased modelsGemini Omni 1.1 Flash is Google's native multimodal video generation and editing model, the generally available successor to Gemini Omni Flash Preview. It is suited for text-to-video, image-to-video, first and...
Pareto is a multimodal composite model built for research, coding, and agentic workflows, while delivering frontier-level performance across a broad range of general-purpose tasks.