API cost decision in 10 seconds

NewGemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Fugu Ultra v2

Pick Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash for lower cost; pick Fugu Ultra v2 only if the larger context window matters more.

Page updated:  Data confirmed:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash for lower cost; pick Fugu Ultra v2 only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is estimated at $6 vs $20 for Fugu Ultra v2, saving $14 (70% lower).

Cost-first pickGemini Omni 1.1 Flash
Context-first pickFugu Ultra v2
Sample savings$1470%
10x traffic gap$140

Fugu Ultra v2 has more context, but Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash saves $14 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $140. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickGemini Omni 1.1 FlashFugu Ultra v2
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputGemini Omni 1.1 Flash$12$40
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputGemini Omni 1.1 Flash$10.5$35
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputGemini Omni 1.1 Flash$46.5$155
Cheaper input Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash $1.5 vs $5 / 1M

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is $3.5 cheaper per 1M input tokens (70% lower; 3.33x difference).

Cheaper output Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash $9 vs $30 / 1M

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is $21 cheaper per 1M output tokens (70% lower; 3.33x difference).

Larger context Fugu Ultra v2 131.07K vs 1M

Fugu Ultra v2 has 868.93K more context (7.63x larger).

Sample workload Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash $6 vs $20

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is $14 cheaper on the standard workload (70% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash Calculating… Estimated API cost
Fugu Ultra v2 Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash has the lower input price; Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash has the lower output price; Fugu Ultra v2 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $6 for Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash and $20 for Fugu Ultra v2.

Best Fit

Choose Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Choose Fugu Ultra v2 when you care most about larger context window.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is estimated at $6 vs $20 for Fugu Ultra v2, saving $14 (70% lower).
  • Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is $14 cheaper on the standard workload (70% lower).
  • Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is $3.5 cheaper per 1M input tokens (70% lower; 3.33x difference).
  • Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is $21 cheaper per 1M output tokens (70% lower; 3.33x difference).
  • Fugu Ultra v2 has 868.93K more context (7.63x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureNewGemini Omni 1.1 Flash
(Google)
Fugu Ultra v2
(Sakana)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$1.5$5
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$9$30
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$6$20
Context Window131.07K1M
Release Date

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionGemini Omni 1.1 FlashOn the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is estimated at $6 vs $20 for Fugu Ultra v2, saving $14 (70% lower).
High-volume input processingGemini Omni 1.1 FlashLower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsGemini Omni 1.1 FlashLower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workFugu Ultra v2A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
  • Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) can replace Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • Gemma 4 31B (free) can replace Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • Lyria 3 Pro Preview can replace Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • Lyria 3 Clip Preview can replace Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
Larger context near this budget

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Google catalog

Review all tracked Google models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Google models

Sakana catalog

Check other Sakana models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Sakana models
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is Google's native multimodal video generation and editing model, the generally available successor to Gemini Omni Flash Preview. It is suited for text-to-video, image-to-video, first and...

Fugu Ultra v2

Fugu Ultra v2 is the higher-performance model in Sakana AI's Fugu family. Rather than a single monolithic model, Fugu is a learned multi-agent orchestration system: a language model trained to...