API cost decision in 10 seconds

NewGemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs GPT Sol Latest

Pick Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash for lower cost; pick GPT Sol Latest only if the larger context window matters more.

Page updated:  Data confirmed:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash for lower cost; pick GPT Sol Latest only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is estimated at $6 vs $7 for GPT Sol Latest, saving $1 (14.3% lower).

Cost-first pickGemini Omni 1.1 Flash
Context-first pickGPT Sol Latest
Sample savings$114.3%
10x traffic gap$10

GPT Sol Latest has more context, but Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash saves $1 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $10. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickGemini Omni 1.1 FlashGPT Sol Latest
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputGemini Omni 1.1 Flash$12$15
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputGemini Omni 1.1 Flash$10.5$12
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputGemini Omni 1.1 Flash$46.5$52
Cheaper input Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash $1.5 vs $2 / 1M

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is $0.5 cheaper per 1M input tokens (25% lower; 1.33x difference).

Cheaper output Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash $9 vs $10 / 1M

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is $1 cheaper per 1M output tokens (10% lower; 1.11x difference).

Larger context GPT Sol Latest 131.07K vs 1.05M

GPT Sol Latest has 918.93K more context (8.01x larger).

Sample workload Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash $6 vs $7

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is $1 cheaper on the standard workload (14.3% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash Calculating… Estimated API cost
GPT Sol Latest Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash has the lower input price; Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash has the lower output price; GPT Sol Latest offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $6 for Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash and $7 for GPT Sol Latest.

Best Fit

Choose Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Choose GPT Sol Latest when you care most about larger context window.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is estimated at $6 vs $7 for GPT Sol Latest, saving $1 (14.3% lower).
  • Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is $1 cheaper on the standard workload (14.3% lower).
  • Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is $0.5 cheaper per 1M input tokens (25% lower; 1.33x difference).
  • Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is $1 cheaper per 1M output tokens (10% lower; 1.11x difference).
  • GPT Sol Latest has 918.93K more context (8.01x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureNewGemini Omni 1.1 Flash
(Google)		GPT Sol Latest
(OpenAI)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M		$1.5$2
Completion Price
per 1M tokens		$9$10
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output		$6$7
Context Window131.07K1.05M
Release Date

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionGemini Omni 1.1 FlashOn the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is estimated at $6 vs $7 for GPT Sol Latest, saving $1 (14.3% lower).
High-volume input processingGemini Omni 1.1 FlashLower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsGemini Omni 1.1 FlashLower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workGPT Sol LatestA larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
  • Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) can replace Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • Gemma 4 31B (free) can replace Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • Lyria 3 Pro Preview can replace Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • Lyria 3 Clip Preview can replace Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
Larger context near this budget

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Google catalog

Review all tracked Google models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Google models

OpenAI catalog

Check other OpenAI models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open OpenAI models
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is Google's native multimodal video generation and editing model, the generally available successor to Gemini Omni Flash Preview. It is suited for text-to-video, image-to-video, first and...

GPT Sol Latest

This model always redirects to the latest model in the GPT Sol family.