API cost decision in 10 seconds

NewGemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Aion 3.5

The standard workload cost is tied; choose by context window, provider fit, latency, or model quality.

Page updated: 2026-11-05T18:07:28Z Data confirmed: 2026-11-05T20:07:24Z Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

The standard workload cost is tied; choose by context window, provider fit, latency, or model quality.

Both models are estimated at $6 for the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Cost-first pickTie

Context-first pickAion 3.5

Sample savings$00%

10x traffic gap$0

Context-window winner: Aion 3.5. Cost does not separate this pair on the standard workload, so the next decision point is context window and model behavior.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash, balanced workload favors Aion 3.5, and output-heavy chatbot favors Aion 3.5.

Workload shape	Token mix	Better pick	Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash	Aion 3.5
Input-heavy / RAG	5M input + 500K output	Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash	$12	$18
Balanced workload	1M input + 1M output	Aion 3.5	$10.5	$9
Output-heavy chatbot	1M input + 5M output	Aion 3.5	$46.5	$33

Cheaper input Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash $1.5 vs $3 / 1M

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is $1.5 cheaper per 1M input tokens (50% lower; 2x difference).

Cheaper output Aion 3.5 $9 vs $6 / 1M

Aion 3.5 is $3 cheaper per 1M output tokens (33.3% lower; 1.5x difference).

Larger context Aion 3.5 131.07K vs 262.14K

Aion 3.5 has 131.07K more context (2x larger).

Sample workload Tie $6 vs $6

Both models have the same estimated cost for the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload: $6.

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.

Monthly input tokens Monthly output tokens

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash Calculating… Estimated API cost

Aion 3.5 Calculating… Estimated API cost

Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash has the lower input price; Aion 3.5 has the lower output price; Aion 3.5 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, the standard workload cost is tied.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $6 for Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash and $6 for Aion 3.5.

Best Fit

Choose Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash when you care most about lower input-token price.

Choose Aion 3.5 when you care most about lower output-token price, and larger context window.

Decision Notes

Both models are estimated at $6 for the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Both models have the same estimated cost for the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload: $6.
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is $1.5 cheaper per 1M input tokens (50% lower; 2x difference).
Aion 3.5 is $3 cheaper per 1M output tokens (33.3% lower; 1.5x difference).
Aion 3.5 has 131.07K more context (2x larger).

Head-to-Head Specs

Feature	NewGemini Omni 1.1 Flash (Google)	Aion 3.5 (AionLabs)
Input Price prompt tokens per 1M	$1.5	$3
Completion Price per 1M tokens	$9	$6
Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output	$6	$6
Context Window	131.07K	262.14K
Release Date	2026-11-04	2026-09-23

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use case	Better pick	Why
Budget-constrained production	Tie	Both models are estimated at $6 for the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
High-volume input processing	Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash	Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbots	Aion 3.5	Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document work	Aion 3.5	A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps

Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) can replace Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
Gemma 4 31B (free) can replace Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
Lyria 3 Pro Preview can replace Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
Lyria 3 Clip Preview can replace Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.

Larger context near this budget

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
Llama 4 Scout offers 1.31M context with $0.25 sample workload cost.
GPT-6 Luna offers 1.05M context with $0.35 sample workload cost.

Popular competitors

Kimi K3.1 Pro · MoonshotAI · #1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 · DeepSeek · #2
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · DeepSeek · #3
GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #4

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Google catalog

Review all tracked Google models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Google models

AionLabs catalog

Check other AionLabs models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open AionLabs models

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is Google's native multimodal video generation and editing model, the generally available successor to Gemini Omni Flash Preview. It is suited for text-to-video, image-to-video, first and...

Aion 3.5

Aion 3.5 is a multi-model roleplaying and storytelling system from AionLabs, built on the GLM family of models. It uses a collaborative generation process in which multiple specialized models each...