API cost decision in 10 seconds

NewGemini 4 Argon vs Fugu Max

Pick Fugu Max for lower cost; pick Gemini 4 Argon only if the larger context window matters more.

Page updated:  Data confirmed:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Fugu Max for lower cost; pick Gemini 4 Argon only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Fugu Max is estimated at $5 vs $7 for Gemini 4 Argon, saving $2 (28.6% lower).

Cost-first pickFugu Max
Context-first pickGemini 4 Argon
Sample savings$228.6%
10x traffic gap$20

Gemini 4 Argon has more context, but Fugu Max saves $2 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $20. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Fugu Max stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickGemini 4 ArgonFugu Max
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputFugu Max$15$13
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputFugu Max$12$8
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputFugu Max$52$32
Cheaper input Tie $2 vs $2 / 1M

Both models report the same input price at $2 per 1M tokens.

Cheaper output Fugu Max $10 vs $6 / 1M

Fugu Max is $4 cheaper per 1M output tokens (40% lower; 1.67x difference).

Larger context Gemini 4 Argon 1.05M vs 1M

Gemini 4 Argon has 48.58K more context (1.05x larger).

Sample workload Fugu Max $7 vs $5

Fugu Max is $2 cheaper on the standard workload (28.6% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
Gemini 4 Argon Calculating… Estimated API cost
Fugu Max Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

both models tie on input price; Fugu Max has the lower output price; Gemini 4 Argon offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Fugu Max is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $7 for Gemini 4 Argon and $5 for Fugu Max.

Best Fit

Choose Gemini 4 Argon when you care most about larger context window.

Choose Fugu Max when you care most about lower output-token price.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Fugu Max is estimated at $5 vs $7 for Gemini 4 Argon, saving $2 (28.6% lower).
  • Fugu Max is $2 cheaper on the standard workload (28.6% lower).
  • Both models report the same input price at $2 per 1M tokens.
  • Fugu Max is $4 cheaper per 1M output tokens (40% lower; 1.67x difference).
  • Gemini 4 Argon has 48.58K more context (1.05x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureNewGemini 4 Argon
(Google)
Fugu Max
(Sakana)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$2$2
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$10$6
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$7$5
Context Window1.05M1M
Release Date

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionFugu MaxOn the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Fugu Max is estimated at $5 vs $7 for Gemini 4 Argon, saving $2 (28.6% lower).
High-volume input processingTieLower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsFugu MaxLower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workGemini 4 ArgonA larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
Larger context near this budget

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Google catalog

Review all tracked Google models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Google models

Sakana catalog

Check other Sakana models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Sakana models
Gemini 4 Argon

Gemini 4 Argon is Google's flagship reasoning model, built for complex software engineering, deep mathematical and scientific problem solving, and autonomous multi-step agents. Google trained it to keep context across...

Fugu Max

Fugu Max is the cost-performance model in Sakana AI's Fugu family. Rather than a single monolithic model, Fugu is a learned multi-agent orchestration system: a language model trained to route...