Both models report the same input price at $0.5 per 1M tokens.
API cost decision in 10 seconds
🔥Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs R1 0528
Pick R1 0528 for lower cost; pick Gemini 3 Flash Preview only if the larger context window matters more.
Budget verdict
Pick R1 0528 for lower cost; pick Gemini 3 Flash Preview only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, R1 0528 is estimated at $1.57 vs $2 for Gemini 3 Flash Preview, saving $0.43 (21.3% lower).
Gemini 3 Flash Preview has more context, but R1 0528 saves $0.43 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $4.25. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
R1 0528 stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | R1 0528 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | R1 0528 | $4 | $3.58 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | R1 0528 | $3.5 | $2.65 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | R1 0528 | $15.5 | $11.25 |
R1 0528 is $0.85 cheaper per 1M output tokens (28.3% lower; 1.4x difference).
Gemini 3 Flash Preview has 884.74K more context (6.4x larger).
R1 0528 is $0.43 cheaper on the standard workload (21.3% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
both models tie on input price; R1 0528 has the lower output price; Gemini 3 Flash Preview offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, R1 0528 is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $2 for Gemini 3 Flash Preview and $1.57 for R1 0528.
Choose Gemini 3 Flash Preview when you care most about larger context window.
Choose R1 0528 when you care most about lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, R1 0528 is estimated at $1.57 vs $2 for Gemini 3 Flash Preview, saving $0.43 (21.3% lower).
- R1 0528 is $0.43 cheaper on the standard workload (21.3% lower).
- Both models report the same input price at $0.5 per 1M tokens.
- R1 0528 is $0.85 cheaper per 1M output tokens (28.3% lower; 1.4x difference).
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview has 884.74K more context (6.4x larger).
| Feature | 🔥Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Google) | R1 0528 (DeepSeek) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.5 | $0.5 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $3 | $2.15 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $2 | $1.57 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 163.84K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #7 | #106 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | R1 0528 | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, R1 0528 is estimated at $1.57 vs $2 for Gemini 3 Flash Preview, saving $0.43 (21.3% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Tie | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | R1 0528 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Gemma 4 31B (free) can replace Gemini 3 Flash Preview when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) can replace Gemini 3 Flash Preview when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Lyria 3 Clip Preview can replace Gemini 3 Flash Preview when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Lyria 3 Pro Preview can replace Gemini 3 Flash Preview when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsGoogle catalog
Review all tracked Google models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Google modelsDeepSeek catalog
Check other DeepSeek models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open DeepSeek modelsGemini 3 Flash Preview is a high speed, high value thinking model designed for agentic workflows, multi turn chat, and coding assistance. It delivers near Pro level reasoning and tool...
May 28th update to the [original DeepSeek R1](/deepseek/deepseek-r1) Performance on par with [OpenAI o1](/openai/o1), but open-sourced and with fully open reasoning tokens. It's 671B parameters in size, with 37B active...