API cost decision in 10 seconds

NewGemini 3.5 Flash vs Palmyra X5

Pick Palmyra X5 for lower cost; pick Gemini 3.5 Flash only if the larger context window matters more.

Pricing data updated: 2026-05-26T11:08:00Z Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Palmyra X5 for lower cost; pick Gemini 3.5 Flash only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Palmyra X5 is estimated at $3.6 vs $6 for Gemini 3.5 Flash, saving $2.4 (40% lower).

Cost-first pickPalmyra X5

Context-first pickGemini 3.5 Flash

Sample savings$2.440%

10x traffic gap$24

Gemini 3.5 Flash has more context, but Palmyra X5 saves $2.4 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $24. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Palmyra X5 stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shape	Token mix	Better pick	Gemini 3.5 Flash	Palmyra X5
Input-heavy / RAG	5M input + 500K output	Palmyra X5	$12	$6
Balanced workload	1M input + 1M output	Palmyra X5	$10.5	$6.6
Output-heavy chatbot	1M input + 5M output	Palmyra X5	$46.5	$30.6

Cheaper input Palmyra X5 $1.5 vs $0.6 / 1M

Palmyra X5 is $0.9 cheaper per 1M input tokens (60% lower; 2.5x difference).

Cheaper output Palmyra X5 $9 vs $6 / 1M

Palmyra X5 is $3 cheaper per 1M output tokens (33.3% lower; 1.5x difference).

Larger context Gemini 3.5 Flash 1.05M vs 1.04M

Gemini 3.5 Flash has 8.58K more context (1.01x larger).

Sample workload Palmyra X5 $6 vs $3.6

Palmyra X5 is $2.4 cheaper on the standard workload (40% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.

Monthly input tokens Monthly output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Calculating… Estimated API cost

Palmyra X5 Calculating… Estimated API cost

Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Palmyra X5 has the lower input price; Palmyra X5 has the lower output price; Gemini 3.5 Flash offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Palmyra X5 is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $6 for Gemini 3.5 Flash and $3.6 for Palmyra X5.

Best Fit

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash when you care most about larger context window.

Choose Palmyra X5 when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Decision Notes

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Palmyra X5 is estimated at $3.6 vs $6 for Gemini 3.5 Flash, saving $2.4 (40% lower).
Palmyra X5 is $2.4 cheaper on the standard workload (40% lower).
Palmyra X5 is $0.9 cheaper per 1M input tokens (60% lower; 2.5x difference).
Palmyra X5 is $3 cheaper per 1M output tokens (33.3% lower; 1.5x difference).
Gemini 3.5 Flash has 8.58K more context (1.01x larger).

Head-to-Head Specs

Feature	NewGemini 3.5 Flash (Google)	Palmyra X5 (Writer)
Input Price prompt tokens per 1M	$1.5	$0.6
Completion Price per 1M tokens	$9	$6
Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output	$6	$3.6
Context Window	1.05M	1.04M
Release Date	2026-05-19	2026-01-21

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use case	Better pick	Why
Budget-constrained production	Palmyra X5	On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Palmyra X5 is estimated at $3.6 vs $6 for Gemini 3.5 Flash, saving $2.4 (40% lower).
High-volume input processing	Palmyra X5	Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbots	Palmyra X5	Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document work	Gemini 3.5 Flash	A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps

Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) can replace Gemini 3.5 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
Gemma 4 31B (free) can replace Gemini 3.5 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
Lyria 3 Pro Preview can replace Gemini 3.5 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
Lyria 3 Clip Preview can replace Gemini 3.5 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.

Larger context near this budget

Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $5 sample workload cost.
Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.

Popular competitors

No popular competitor is currently available.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Google catalog

Review all tracked Google models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Google models

Writer catalog

Check other Writer models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Writer models

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash is Google's high-efficiency multimodal model, bringing near-Pro level coding and reasoning at Flash-tier cost and speed. It is highly optimized for coding proficiency and parallel agentic execution...

Palmyra X5

Palmyra X5 is Writer's most advanced model, purpose-built for building and scaling AI agents across the enterprise. It delivers industry-leading speed and efficiency on context windows up to 1 million...