API cost decision in 10 seconds

🔥Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free)

Pick Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free) for lower cost; pick Gemini 3.5 Flash only if the larger context window matters more.

Pricing data updated:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free) for lower cost; pick Gemini 3.5 Flash only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free) is estimated at $0 vs $6 for Gemini 3.5 Flash, saving $6 (100% lower).

Cost-first pickNemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free)
Context-first pickGemini 3.5 Flash
Sample savings$6100%
10x traffic gap$60

Gemini 3.5 Flash has more context, but Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free) saves $6 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $60. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free) stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickGemini 3.5 FlashNemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free)
Input-heavy / RAG 5M input + 500K output Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free) $12 $0
Balanced workload 1M input + 1M output Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free) $10.5 $0
Output-heavy chatbot 1M input + 5M output Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free) $46.5 $0
Cheaper inputNemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free)$1.5 vs $0 / 1M
Cheaper outputNemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free)$9 vs $0 / 1M
Larger contextGemini 3.5 Flash1.05M vs 128K
Sample workloadNemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free)$6 vs $0

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
Gemini 3.5 FlashCalculating…Estimated API cost
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free)Calculating…Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workloadCalculating…Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free) has the lower input price, Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free) has the lower output price, and Gemini 3.5 Flash offers the larger context window.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $6 for Gemini 3.5 Flash and $0 for Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free).

Best Fit

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash when you care most about larger context window.

Choose Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free) when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Head-to-Head Specs
Feature🔥Gemini 3.5 Flash
(Google)
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free)
(NVIDIA)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$1.5$0
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$9$0
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$6$0
Context Window1.05M128K
Release Date2026-05-192025-10-28
Popularity#11
Gemini 3.5 Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash is Google's high-efficiency multimodal model, bringing near-Pro level coding and reasoning at Flash-tier cost and speed. It is highly optimized for coding proficiency and parallel agentic execution...

Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free)

NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 2 VL is a 12-billion-parameter open multimodal reasoning model designed for video understanding and document intelligence. It introduces a hybrid Transformer-Mamba architecture, combining transformer-level accuracy with Mamba’s...

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionNemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free)On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free) is estimated at $0 vs $6 for Gemini 3.5 Flash, saving $6 (100% lower).
High-volume input processingNemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free)Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts or retrieved passages dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsNemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free)Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workGemini 3.5 FlashA larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages and source files.