Step 3.5 Flash is $1.9 cheaper per 1M input tokens (95% lower; 20x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
🔥Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs 🔥Step 3.5 Flash
Pick Step 3.5 Flash for lower cost; pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview only if the larger context window matters more.
Budget verdict
Pick Step 3.5 Flash for lower cost; pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Step 3.5 Flash is estimated at $0.25 vs $8 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, saving $7.75 (96.9% lower).
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has more context, but Step 3.5 Flash saves $7.75 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $77.5. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Step 3.5 Flash is $11.7 cheaper per 1M output tokens (97.5% lower; 40x difference).
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 786.43K more context (4x larger).
Step 3.5 Flash is $7.75 cheaper on the standard workload (96.9% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Step 3.5 Flash has the lower input price; Step 3.5 Flash has the lower output price; Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $8 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and $0.25 for Step 3.5 Flash.
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when you care most about larger context window.
Choose Step 3.5 Flash when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Step 3.5 Flash is estimated at $0.25 vs $8 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, saving $7.75 (96.9% lower).
- Step 3.5 Flash is $7.75 cheaper on the standard workload (96.9% lower).
- Step 3.5 Flash is $1.9 cheaper per 1M input tokens (95% lower; 20x difference).
- Step 3.5 Flash is $11.7 cheaper per 1M output tokens (97.5% lower; 40x difference).
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 786.43K more context (4x larger).
| Feature | 🔥Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (Google) | 🔥Step 3.5 Flash (StepFun) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $2 | $0.1 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $12 | $0.3 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $8 | $0.25 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 262.14K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity Rank current rank | #10 | #11 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Step 3.5 Flash | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Step 3.5 Flash is estimated at $0.25 vs $8 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, saving $7.75 (96.9% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Step 3.5 Flash | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Step 3.5 Flash | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) can replace Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Gemma 4 31B (free) can replace Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Lyria 3 Pro Preview can replace Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Lyria 3 Clip Preview can replace Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Grok 4.1 Fast offers 2M context with $0.45 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4 Fast offers 2M context with $0.45 sample workload cost.
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #1
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #2
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #3
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models ranked by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsGoogle catalog
Review all tracked Google models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Google modelsStepFun catalog
Check other StepFun models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open StepFun modelsGemini 3.1 Pro Preview is Google’s frontier reasoning model, delivering enhanced software engineering performance, improved agentic reliability, and more efficient token usage across complex workflows. Building on the multimodal foundation...
Step 3.5 Flash is StepFun's most capable open-source foundation model. Built on a sparse Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture, it selectively activates only 11B of its 196B parameters per token....