Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is $3 cheaper per 1M input tokens (60% lower; 2.5x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
🔥Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs 🔥Claude Opus 4.6
Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when budget and context both matter.
Budget verdict
Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is estimated at $8 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus 4.6, saving $9.5 (54.3% lower).
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $95. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Claude Opus 4.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | $16 | $37.5 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | $14 | $30 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | $62 | $130 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is $13 cheaper per 1M output tokens (52% lower; 2.08x difference).
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 48.58K more context (1.05x larger).
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is $9.5 cheaper on the standard workload (54.3% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the lower input price; Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the lower output price; Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $8 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and $17.5 for Claude Opus 4.6.
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when you care most about lower input-token price, lower output-token price, and larger context window.
Choose Claude Opus 4.6 when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is estimated at $8 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus 4.6, saving $9.5 (54.3% lower).
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is $9.5 cheaper on the standard workload (54.3% lower).
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is $3 cheaper per 1M input tokens (60% lower; 2.5x difference).
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is $13 cheaper per 1M output tokens (52% lower; 2.08x difference).
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 48.58K more context (1.05x larger).
| Feature | 🔥Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (Google) | 🔥Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $2 | $5 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $12 | $25 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $8 | $17.5 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #13 | #16 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is estimated at $8 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus 4.6, saving $9.5 (54.3% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) can replace Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Gemma 4 31B (free) can replace Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Lyria 3 Pro Preview can replace Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Lyria 3 Clip Preview can replace Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- GPT-5.5 offers 1.05M context with $20 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsGoogle catalog
Review all tracked Google models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Google modelsAnthropic catalog
Check other Anthropic models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Anthropic modelsGemini 3.1 Pro Preview is Google’s frontier reasoning model, delivering enhanced software engineering performance, improved agentic reliability, and more efficient token usage across complex workflows. Building on the multimodal foundation...
Opus 4.6 is Anthropic’s strongest model for coding and long-running professional tasks. It is built for agents that operate across entire workflows rather than single prompts, making it especially effective...