GPT-5.1-Codex is $0.75 cheaper per 1M input tokens (37.5% lower; 1.6x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools vs GPT-5.1-Codex
Pick GPT-5.1-Codex for lower cost; pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools only if the larger context window matters more.
Budget verdict
Pick GPT-5.1-Codex for lower cost; pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-5.1-Codex is estimated at $6.25 vs $8 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools, saving $1.75 (21.9% lower).
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools has more context, but GPT-5.1-Codex saves $1.75 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $17.5. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
GPT-5.1-Codex stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | GPT-5.1-Codex | $16 | $11.25 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | GPT-5.1-Codex | $14 | $11.25 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | GPT-5.1-Codex | $62 | $51.25 |
GPT-5.1-Codex is $2 cheaper per 1M output tokens (16.7% lower; 1.2x difference).
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools has 648.76K more context (2.62x larger).
GPT-5.1-Codex is $1.75 cheaper on the standard workload (21.9% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
GPT-5.1-Codex has the lower input price; GPT-5.1-Codex has the lower output price; Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, GPT-5.1-Codex is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $8 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools and $6.25 for GPT-5.1-Codex.
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools when you care most about larger context window.
Choose GPT-5.1-Codex when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-5.1-Codex is estimated at $6.25 vs $8 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools, saving $1.75 (21.9% lower).
- GPT-5.1-Codex is $1.75 cheaper on the standard workload (21.9% lower).
- GPT-5.1-Codex is $0.75 cheaper per 1M input tokens (37.5% lower; 1.6x difference).
- GPT-5.1-Codex is $2 cheaper per 1M output tokens (16.7% lower; 1.2x difference).
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools has 648.76K more context (2.62x larger).
| Feature | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools (Google) | GPT-5.1-Codex (OpenAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $2 | $1.25 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $12 | $10 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $8 | $6.25 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 400K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | GPT-5.1-Codex | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-5.1-Codex is estimated at $6.25 vs $8 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools, saving $1.75 (21.9% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | GPT-5.1-Codex | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | GPT-5.1-Codex | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) can replace Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Gemma 4 31B (free) can replace Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Lyria 3 Pro Preview can replace Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Lyria 3 Clip Preview can replace Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- GPT-5.4 offers 1.05M context with $10 sample workload cost.
- No popular competitor is currently available.
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsGoogle catalog
Review all tracked Google models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Google modelsOpenAI catalog
Check other OpenAI models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open OpenAI modelsGemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools is a variant of Gemini 3.1 Pro that improves tool selection behavior by preventing overuse of a general bash tool when more efficient third-party...
GPT-5.1-Codex is a specialized version of GPT-5.1 optimized for software engineering and coding workflows. It is designed for both interactive development sessions and long, independent execution of complex engineering tasks....