API cost decision in 10 seconds

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) vs R1

Pick R1 when budget and context both matter.

Page updated:  Data confirmed:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick R1 when budget and context both matter.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, R1 is estimated at $1.95 vs $2 for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview), saving $0.05 (2.5% lower).

Cost-first pickR1
Context-first pickR1
Sample savings$0.052.5%
10x traffic gap$0.5

R1 is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.5. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview), balanced workload favors R1, and output-heavy chatbot favors R1.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)R1
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)$4$4.75
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputR1$3.5$3.2
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputR1$15.5$13.2
Cheaper input Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) $0.5 vs $0.7 / 1M

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) is $0.2 cheaper per 1M input tokens (28.6% lower; 1.4x difference).

Cheaper output R1 $3 vs $2.5 / 1M

R1 is $0.5 cheaper per 1M output tokens (16.7% lower; 1.2x difference).

Larger context R1 131.07K vs 163.84K

R1 has 32.77K more context (1.25x larger).

Sample workload R1 $2 vs $1.95

R1 is $0.05 cheaper on the standard workload (2.5% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) Calculating… Estimated API cost
R1 Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) has the lower input price; R1 has the lower output price; R1 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, R1 is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $2 for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) and $1.95 for R1.

Best Fit

Choose Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) when you care most about lower input-token price.

Choose R1 when you care most about lower output-token price, and larger context window.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, R1 is estimated at $1.95 vs $2 for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview), saving $0.05 (2.5% lower).
  • R1 is $0.05 cheaper on the standard workload (2.5% lower).
  • Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) is $0.2 cheaper per 1M input tokens (28.6% lower; 1.4x difference).
  • R1 is $0.5 cheaper per 1M output tokens (16.7% lower; 1.2x difference).
  • R1 has 32.77K more context (1.25x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)
(Google)
R1
(DeepSeek)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$0.5$0.7
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$3$2.5
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$2$1.95
Context Window131.07K163.84K
Release Date
Popularity#129#144

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionR1On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, R1 is estimated at $1.95 vs $2 for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview), saving $0.05 (2.5% lower).
High-volume input processingNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsR1Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workR1A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
  • Gemma 4 31B (free) can replace Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) can replace Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • Lyria 3 Clip Preview can replace Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • Lyria 3 Pro Preview can replace Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
Larger context near this budget
  • Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
  • Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
  • Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Google catalog

Review all tracked Google models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Google models

DeepSeek catalog

Check other DeepSeek models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open DeepSeek models
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview, a.k.a. "Nano Banana 2," is Google’s latest state of the art image generation and editing model, delivering Pro-level visual quality at Flash speed. It combines...

R1

DeepSeek R1 is here: Performance on par with [OpenAI o1](/openai/o1), but open-sourced and with fully open reasoning tokens. It's 671B parameters in size, with 37B active in an inference pass....