Laguna M.1 (free) is free for input tokens while Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs $0.1 per 1M tokens.
API cost decision in 10 seconds
🔥Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs NewLaguna M.1 (free)
Pick Laguna M.1 (free) for lower cost; pick Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Laguna M.1 (free) for lower cost; pick Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Laguna M.1 (free) is estimated at $0 vs $0.3 for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite, saving $0.3 (100% lower).
Cost-first pickLaguna M.1 (free)
Context-first pickGemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Sample savings$0.3100%
10x traffic gap$3
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has more context, but Laguna M.1 (free) saves $0.3 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $3. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Laguna M.1 (free) stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Laguna M.1 (free) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Laguna M.1 (free) | $0.7 | $0 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Laguna M.1 (free) | $0.5 | $0 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Laguna M.1 (free) | $2.1 | $0 |
Laguna M.1 (free) is free for output tokens while Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs $0.4 per 1M tokens.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has 917.5K more context (8x larger).
Laguna M.1 (free) is free for the standard workload while the other model is estimated at $0.3.
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Laguna M.1 (free) has the lower input price; Laguna M.1 (free) has the lower output price; Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Laguna M.1 (free) is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.3 for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and $0 for Laguna M.1 (free).
Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite when you care most about larger context window.
Choose Laguna M.1 (free) when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Laguna M.1 (free) is estimated at $0 vs $0.3 for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite, saving $0.3 (100% lower).
- Laguna M.1 (free) is free for the standard workload while the other model is estimated at $0.3.
- Laguna M.1 (free) is free for input tokens while Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs $0.1 per 1M tokens.
- Laguna M.1 (free) is free for output tokens while Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs $0.4 per 1M tokens.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has 917.5K more context (8x larger).
| Feature | 🔥Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite (Google) | NewLaguna M.1 (free) (Poolside) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.1 | $0 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.4 | $0 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.3 | $0 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 131.07K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #10 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Laguna M.1 (free) | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Laguna M.1 (free) is estimated at $0 vs $0.3 for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite, saving $0.3 (100% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Laguna M.1 (free) | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Laguna M.1 (free) | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) can replace Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Gemma 4 31B (free) can replace Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Lyria 3 Pro Preview can replace Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Lyria 3 Clip Preview can replace Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsGoogle catalog
Review all tracked Google models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Google modelsPoolside catalog
Check other Poolside models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Poolside modelsGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is a lightweight reasoning model in the Gemini 2.5 family, optimized for ultra-low latency and cost efficiency. It offers improved throughput, faster token generation, and better performance...
Laguna M.1 is the flagship coding agent model from [Poolside](https://poolside.ai), optimized for complex software engineering tasks. Designed for agentic coding workflows, it supports tool calling and reasoning, with a 128K...