GLM 4.6V is $0.14 cheaper per 1M input tokens (31% lower; 1.45x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
🔥DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 4.6V
Pick GLM 4.6V for lower cost; pick DeepSeek V4 Pro only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick GLM 4.6V for lower cost; pick DeepSeek V4 Pro only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 4.6V is estimated at $0.75 vs $0.87 for DeepSeek V4 Pro, saving $0.12 (13.8% lower).
Cost-first pickGLM 4.6V
Context-first pickDeepSeek V4 Pro
Sample savings$0.1213.8%
10x traffic gap$1.2
DeepSeek V4 Pro has more context, but GLM 4.6V saves $0.12 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $1.2. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors GLM 4.6V, balanced workload favors GLM 4.6V, and output-heavy chatbot favors DeepSeek V4 Pro.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | DeepSeek V4 Pro | GLM 4.6V |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | GLM 4.6V | $2.61 | $1.95 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | GLM 4.6V | $1.3 | $1.2 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | DeepSeek V4 Pro | $4.78 | $4.8 |
DeepSeek V4 Pro is $0.03 cheaper per 1M output tokens (3.3% lower; 1.03x difference).
DeepSeek V4 Pro has 917.5K more context (8x larger).
GLM 4.6V is $0.12 cheaper on the standard workload (13.8% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
GLM 4.6V has the lower input price; DeepSeek V4 Pro has the lower output price; DeepSeek V4 Pro offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, GLM 4.6V is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.87 for DeepSeek V4 Pro and $0.75 for GLM 4.6V.
Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro when you care most about lower output-token price, and larger context window.
Choose GLM 4.6V when you care most about lower input-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 4.6V is estimated at $0.75 vs $0.87 for DeepSeek V4 Pro, saving $0.12 (13.8% lower).
- GLM 4.6V is $0.12 cheaper on the standard workload (13.8% lower).
- GLM 4.6V is $0.14 cheaper per 1M input tokens (31% lower; 1.45x difference).
- DeepSeek V4 Pro is $0.03 cheaper per 1M output tokens (3.3% lower; 1.03x difference).
- DeepSeek V4 Pro has 917.5K more context (8x larger).
| Feature | 🔥DeepSeek V4 Pro (DeepSeek) | GLM 4.6V (Z.ai) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.435 | $0.3 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.87 | $0.9 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.87 | $0.75 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 131.07K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #6 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | GLM 4.6V | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 4.6V is estimated at $0.75 vs $0.87 for DeepSeek V4 Pro, saving $0.12 (13.8% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | GLM 4.6V | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | DeepSeek V4 Pro | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) can replace DeepSeek V4 Pro when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash can replace DeepSeek V4 Pro when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.2.
- R1 Distill Qwen 32B can replace DeepSeek V4 Pro when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.43.
- DeepSeek V3.2 can replace DeepSeek V4 Pro when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.44.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsDeepSeek catalog
Review all tracked DeepSeek models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open DeepSeek modelsZ.ai catalog
Check other Z.ai models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Z.ai modelsDeepSeek V4 Pro is a large-scale Mixture-of-Experts model from DeepSeek with 1.6T total parameters and 49B activated parameters, supporting a 1M-token context window. It is designed for advanced reasoning, coding,...
GLM-4.6V is a large multimodal model designed for high-fidelity visual understanding and long-context reasoning across images, documents, and mixed media. It supports up to 128K tokens, processes complex page layouts...