GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) is $0.3 cheaper per 1M input tokens (74.8% lower; 3.97x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
🔥DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch)
Pick GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) when budget and context both matter.
Budget verdict
Pick GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) is estimated at $0.4 vs $0.79 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423, saving $0.39 (49.6% lower).
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $3.94. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 | GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) | $2.38 | $0.8 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) | $1.19 | $0.7 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) | $4.37 | $3.1 |
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) is $0.19 cheaper per 1M output tokens (24.4% lower; 1.32x difference).
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) has 1.42K more context (1x larger).
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) is $0.39 cheaper on the standard workload (49.6% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) has the lower input price; GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) has the lower output price; GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.79 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and $0.4 for GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch).
Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
Choose GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) when you care most about lower input-token price, lower output-token price, and larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) is estimated at $0.4 vs $0.79 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423, saving $0.39 (49.6% lower).
- GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) is $0.39 cheaper on the standard workload (49.6% lower).
- GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) is $0.3 cheaper per 1M input tokens (74.8% lower; 3.97x difference).
- GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) is $0.19 cheaper per 1M output tokens (24.4% lower; 1.32x difference).
- GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) has 1.42K more context (1x larger).
| Feature | 🔥DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 (DeepSeek) | GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) (OpenAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.3969 | $0.1 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.7938 | $0.6 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.79 | $0.4 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #10 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) is estimated at $0.4 vs $0.79 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423, saving $0.39 (49.6% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) can replace DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 can replace DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 can replace DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.17.
- R1 Distill Qwen 32B can replace DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.43.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.17 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.11 sample workload cost.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 1.31M context with $0.25 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · DeepSeek · #1
- MiMo-V2.5 · Xiaomi · #2
- Hy3 · Tencent · #3
- Ox Alpha · stealth · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsDeepSeek catalog
Review all tracked DeepSeek models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open DeepSeek modelsOpenAI catalog
Check other OpenAI models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open OpenAI modelsDeepSeek V4 Pro is a large-scale Mixture-of-Experts model from DeepSeek with 1.6T total parameters and 49B activated parameters, supporting a 1M-token context window. It is designed for advanced reasoning, coding,...
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro is the same underlying model as [GPT-5.6 Luna](https://openrouter.ai/openai/gpt-5.6-luna), served with `reasoning.mode` set to `pro` for higher-quality responses on complex tasks. Learn more in OpenAI's docs: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/reasoning#reasoning-mode