Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) is $0.25 cheaper per 1M input tokens (62.2% lower; 2.65x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
🔥DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch)
Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) when budget is the priority.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) when budget is the priority.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) is estimated at $0.78 vs $0.79 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423, saving $0.02 (2.4% lower).
Cost-first pickGemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch)
Context-first pickBoth models
Sample savings$0.022.4%
10x traffic gap$0.19
The reported context window is tied, so cost and provider fit carry more weight. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.19. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch), balanced workload favors DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423, and output-heavy chatbot favors DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) | $2.38 | $1.38 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 | $1.19 | $1.4 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 | $4.37 | $6.4 |
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 is $0.46 cheaper per 1M output tokens (36.5% lower; 1.57x difference).
Both models report the same context window at 1.05M tokens.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) is $0.02 cheaper on the standard workload (2.4% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) has the lower input price; DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 has the lower output price; both models report the same context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.79 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and $0.78 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch).
Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 when you care most about lower output-token price.
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) when you care most about lower input-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) is estimated at $0.78 vs $0.79 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423, saving $0.02 (2.4% lower).
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) is $0.02 cheaper on the standard workload (2.4% lower).
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) is $0.25 cheaper per 1M input tokens (62.2% lower; 2.65x difference).
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 is $0.46 cheaper per 1M output tokens (36.5% lower; 1.57x difference).
- Both models report the same context window at 1.05M tokens.
| Feature | 🔥DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 (DeepSeek) | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) (Google) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.3969 | $0.15 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.7938 | $1.25 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.79 | $0.78 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #10 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) is estimated at $0.78 vs $0.79 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423, saving $0.02 (2.4% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Tie | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) can replace DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 can replace DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 can replace DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.17.
- R1 Distill Qwen 32B can replace DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.43.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.17 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.11 sample workload cost.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 1.31M context with $0.25 sample workload cost.
- MiMo-V2.5 offers 1.05M context with $0.28 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · DeepSeek · #1
- MiMo-V2.5 · Xiaomi · #2
- Hy3 · Tencent · #3
- Ox Alpha · stealth · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsDeepSeek catalog
Review all tracked DeepSeek models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open DeepSeek modelsGoogle catalog
Check other Google models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Google modelsDeepSeek V4 Pro is a large-scale Mixture-of-Experts model from DeepSeek with 1.6T total parameters and 49B activated parameters, supporting a 1M-token context window. It is designed for advanced reasoning, coding,...
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is a high-efficiency model from Google with upgraded agentic capabilities. It is suited for subagents that execute focused tasks within complex, multi-agent workflows.