GLM 4.7 Flash is $0.04 cheaper per 1M input tokens (40% lower; 1.67x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GLM 4.7 Flash
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash when budget and context both matter.
Pricing data updated:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, DeepSeek V4 Flash is estimated at $0.2 vs $0.26 for GLM 4.7 Flash, saving $0.06 (23.1% lower).
Cost-first pickDeepSeek V4 Flash
Context-first pickDeepSeek V4 Flash
Sample savings$0.0623.1%
10x traffic gap$0.6
DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.6. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors GLM 4.7 Flash, balanced workload favors DeepSeek V4 Flash, and output-heavy chatbot favors DeepSeek V4 Flash.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | DeepSeek V4 Flash | GLM 4.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | GLM 4.7 Flash | $0.6 | $0.5 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | DeepSeek V4 Flash | $0.3 | $0.46 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | DeepSeek V4 Flash | $1.1 | $2.06 |
DeepSeek V4 Flash is $0.2 cheaper per 1M output tokens (50% lower; 2x difference).
DeepSeek V4 Flash has 845.82K more context (5.17x larger).
DeepSeek V4 Flash is $0.06 cheaper on the standard workload (23.1% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
GLM 4.7 Flash has the lower input price; DeepSeek V4 Flash has the lower output price; DeepSeek V4 Flash offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.2 for DeepSeek V4 Flash and $0.26 for GLM 4.7 Flash.
Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash when you care most about lower output-token price, and larger context window.
Choose GLM 4.7 Flash when you care most about lower input-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, DeepSeek V4 Flash is estimated at $0.2 vs $0.26 for GLM 4.7 Flash, saving $0.06 (23.1% lower).
- DeepSeek V4 Flash is $0.06 cheaper on the standard workload (23.1% lower).
- GLM 4.7 Flash is $0.04 cheaper per 1M input tokens (40% lower; 1.67x difference).
- DeepSeek V4 Flash is $0.2 cheaper per 1M output tokens (50% lower; 2x difference).
- DeepSeek V4 Flash has 845.82K more context (5.17x larger).
| Feature | DeepSeek V4 Flash (DeepSeek) | GLM 4.7 Flash (Z.ai) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.1 | $0.06 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.2 | $0.4 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.2 | $0.26 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 202.75K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | DeepSeek V4 Flash | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, DeepSeek V4 Flash is estimated at $0.2 vs $0.26 for GLM 4.7 Flash, saving $0.06 (23.1% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | GLM 4.7 Flash | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | DeepSeek V4 Flash | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) can replace DeepSeek V4 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- GLM 4.5 Air (free) can replace GLM 4.7 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- GLM 4 32B can replace GLM 4.7 Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.15.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- No popular competitor is currently available.
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsDeepSeek catalog
Review all tracked DeepSeek models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open DeepSeek modelsZ.ai catalog
Check other Z.ai models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Z.ai modelsDeepSeek V4 Flash is an efficiency-optimized Mixture-of-Experts model from DeepSeek with 284B total parameters and 13B activated parameters, supporting a 1M-token context window. It is designed for fast inference and...
As a 30B-class SOTA model, GLM-4.7-Flash offers a new option that balances performance and efficiency. It is further optimized for agentic coding use cases, strengthening coding capabilities, long-horizon task planning,...