DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is $0.04 cheaper per 1M input tokens (35% lower; 1.54x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
🔥DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs NewGranite 4.2 8B
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 when budget and context both matter.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is estimated at $0.15 vs $0.17 for Granite 4.2 8B, saving $0.02 (11.4% lower).
Cost-first pickDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Context-first pickDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Sample savings$0.0211.4%
10x traffic gap$0.2
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.2. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, balanced workload favors DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, and output-heavy chatbot favors Granite 4.2 8B.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 | $0.42 | $0.57 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 | $0.24 | $0.25 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Granite 4.2 8B | $0.97 | $0.85 |
Granite 4.2 8B is $0.03 cheaper per 1M output tokens (16.7% lower; 1.2x difference).
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has 1.18M more context (10x larger).
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is $0.02 cheaper on the standard workload (11.4% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has the lower input price; Granite 4.2 8B has the lower output price; DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.15 for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and $0.17 for Granite 4.2 8B.
Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 when you care most about lower input-token price, and larger context window.
Choose Granite 4.2 8B when you care most about lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is estimated at $0.15 vs $0.17 for Granite 4.2 8B, saving $0.02 (11.4% lower).
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is $0.02 cheaper on the standard workload (11.4% lower).
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is $0.04 cheaper per 1M input tokens (35% lower; 1.54x difference).
- Granite 4.2 8B is $0.03 cheaper per 1M output tokens (16.7% lower; 1.2x difference).
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has 1.18M more context (10x larger).
| Feature | 🔥DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (DeepSeek) | NewGranite 4.2 8B (IBM) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.065 | $0.1 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.18 | $0.15 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.15 | $0.17 |
| Context Window | 1.31M | 131.07K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #1 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is estimated at $0.15 vs $0.17 for Granite 4.2 8B, saving $0.02 (11.4% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Granite 4.2 8B | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) can replace DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Granite 4.0 Micro can replace Granite 4.2 8B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.07.
- Granite 4.1 8B can replace Granite 4.2 8B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
- No larger-context model is currently tracked within a close sample-cost band.
- MiMo-V2.5 · Xiaomi · #2
- GPT-5.6 Luna · OpenAI · #3
- Hy3 · Tencent · #4
- GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #5
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsDeepSeek catalog
Review all tracked DeepSeek models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open DeepSeek modelsIBM catalog
Check other IBM models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open IBM modelsDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is a sparse mixture-of-experts model from DeepSeek, with 13B active parameters out of 284B total. This re-post-trained revision is suited for coding, reasoning, and agent workflows....
Granite 4.2 8B is a dense reasoning model from IBM. It is suited for mathematics, code generation, multilingual dialogue, and agentic workflows that need multi-step reasoning. It supports full, low-effort,...