DeepSeek V3.2 is $2.75 cheaper per 1M input tokens (91.6% lower; 11.9x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
🔥DeepSeek V3.2 vs Sonar Pro Search
Pick DeepSeek V3.2 for lower cost; pick Sonar Pro Search only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick DeepSeek V3.2 for lower cost; pick Sonar Pro Search only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, DeepSeek V3.2 is estimated at $0.44 vs $10.5 for Sonar Pro Search, saving $10.06 (95.8% lower).
Cost-first pickDeepSeek V3.2
Context-first pickSonar Pro Search
Sample savings$10.0695.8%
10x traffic gap$100.59
Sonar Pro Search has more context, but DeepSeek V3.2 saves $10.06 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $100.59. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
DeepSeek V3.2 stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | DeepSeek V3.2 | Sonar Pro Search |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | DeepSeek V3.2 | $1.45 | $22.5 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | DeepSeek V3.2 | $0.63 | $18 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | DeepSeek V3.2 | $2.14 | $78 |
DeepSeek V3.2 is $14.62 cheaper per 1M output tokens (97.5% lower; 39.7x difference).
Sonar Pro Search has 68.93K more context (1.53x larger).
DeepSeek V3.2 is $10.06 cheaper on the standard workload (95.8% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
DeepSeek V3.2 has the lower input price; DeepSeek V3.2 has the lower output price; Sonar Pro Search offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, DeepSeek V3.2 is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.44 for DeepSeek V3.2 and $10.5 for Sonar Pro Search.
Choose DeepSeek V3.2 when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
Choose Sonar Pro Search when you care most about larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, DeepSeek V3.2 is estimated at $0.44 vs $10.5 for Sonar Pro Search, saving $10.06 (95.8% lower).
- DeepSeek V3.2 is $10.06 cheaper on the standard workload (95.8% lower).
- DeepSeek V3.2 is $2.75 cheaper per 1M input tokens (91.6% lower; 11.9x difference).
- DeepSeek V3.2 is $14.62 cheaper per 1M output tokens (97.5% lower; 39.7x difference).
- Sonar Pro Search has 68.93K more context (1.53x larger).
| Feature | 🔥DeepSeek V3.2 (DeepSeek) | Sonar Pro Search (Perplexity) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.252 | $3 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.378 | $15 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.44 | $10.5 |
| Context Window | 131.07K | 200K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #8 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | DeepSeek V3.2 | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, DeepSeek V3.2 is estimated at $0.44 vs $10.5 for Sonar Pro Search, saving $10.06 (95.8% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | DeepSeek V3.2 | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | DeepSeek V3.2 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Sonar Pro Search | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) can replace DeepSeek V3.2 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash can replace DeepSeek V3.2 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.2.
- R1 Distill Qwen 32B can replace DeepSeek V3.2 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.43.
- Sonar can replace Sonar Pro Search when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.5.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- GPT-5.4 offers 1.05M context with $10 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsDeepSeek catalog
Review all tracked DeepSeek models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open DeepSeek modelsPerplexity catalog
Check other Perplexity models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Perplexity modelsDeepSeek-V3.2 is a large language model designed to harmonize high computational efficiency with strong reasoning and agentic tool-use performance. It introduces DeepSeek Sparse Attention (DSA), a fine-grained sparse attention mechanism...
Exclusively available on the OpenRouter API, Sonar Pro's new Pro Search mode is Perplexity's most advanced agentic search system. It is designed for deeper reasoning and analysis. Pricing is based...