Granite 4.1 8B is $0.2 cheaper per 1M input tokens (80.2% lower; 5.04x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
🔥DeepSeek V3.2 vs NewGranite 4.1 8B
Pick Granite 4.1 8B when budget is the priority.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Granite 4.1 8B when budget is the priority.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Granite 4.1 8B is estimated at $0.1 vs $0.44 for DeepSeek V3.2, saving $0.34 (77.3% lower).
Cost-first pickGranite 4.1 8B
Context-first pickBoth models
Sample savings$0.3477.3%
10x traffic gap$3.41
The reported context window is tied, so cost and provider fit carry more weight. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $3.41. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Granite 4.1 8B stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | DeepSeek V3.2 | Granite 4.1 8B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Granite 4.1 8B | $1.45 | $0.3 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Granite 4.1 8B | $0.63 | $0.15 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Granite 4.1 8B | $2.14 | $0.55 |
Granite 4.1 8B is $0.28 cheaper per 1M output tokens (73.5% lower; 3.78x difference).
Both models report the same context window at 131.07K tokens.
Granite 4.1 8B is $0.34 cheaper on the standard workload (77.3% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Granite 4.1 8B has the lower input price; Granite 4.1 8B has the lower output price; both models report the same context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Granite 4.1 8B is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.44 for DeepSeek V3.2 and $0.1 for Granite 4.1 8B.
Choose DeepSeek V3.2 when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
Choose Granite 4.1 8B when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Granite 4.1 8B is estimated at $0.1 vs $0.44 for DeepSeek V3.2, saving $0.34 (77.3% lower).
- Granite 4.1 8B is $0.34 cheaper on the standard workload (77.3% lower).
- Granite 4.1 8B is $0.2 cheaper per 1M input tokens (80.2% lower; 5.04x difference).
- Granite 4.1 8B is $0.28 cheaper per 1M output tokens (73.5% lower; 3.78x difference).
- Both models report the same context window at 131.07K tokens.
| Feature | 🔥DeepSeek V3.2 (DeepSeek) | NewGranite 4.1 8B (IBM) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.252 | $0.05 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.378 | $0.1 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.44 | $0.1 |
| Context Window | 131.07K | 131.07K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #8 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Granite 4.1 8B | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Granite 4.1 8B is estimated at $0.1 vs $0.44 for DeepSeek V3.2, saving $0.34 (77.3% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Granite 4.1 8B | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Granite 4.1 8B | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Tie | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) can replace DeepSeek V3.2 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash can replace DeepSeek V3.2 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.2.
- R1 Distill Qwen 32B can replace DeepSeek V3.2 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.43.
- Granite 4.0 Micro can replace Granite 4.1 8B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.07.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite offers 1.05M context with $0.3 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsDeepSeek catalog
Review all tracked DeepSeek models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open DeepSeek modelsIBM catalog
Check other IBM models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open IBM modelsDeepSeek-V3.2 is a large language model designed to harmonize high computational efficiency with strong reasoning and agentic tool-use performance. It introduces DeepSeek Sparse Attention (DSA), a fine-grained sparse attention mechanism...
Granite 4.1 8B is a dense, decoder-only 8-billion-parameter language model from IBM, part of the Granite 4.1 family. It supports a 131K-token context window and is designed for enterprise tasks...