Nova Micro 1.0 is $0.22 cheaper per 1M input tokens (86.1% lower; 7.2x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
🔥DeepSeek V3.2 vs Nova Micro 1.0
Pick Nova Micro 1.0 for lower cost; pick DeepSeek V3.2 only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Nova Micro 1.0 for lower cost; pick DeepSeek V3.2 only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nova Micro 1.0 is estimated at $0.11 vs $0.44 for DeepSeek V3.2, saving $0.34 (76.2% lower).
Cost-first pickNova Micro 1.0
Context-first pickDeepSeek V3.2
Sample savings$0.3476.2%
10x traffic gap$3.36
DeepSeek V3.2 has more context, but Nova Micro 1.0 saves $0.34 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $3.36. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Nova Micro 1.0 stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | DeepSeek V3.2 | Nova Micro 1.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Nova Micro 1.0 | $1.45 | $0.25 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Nova Micro 1.0 | $0.63 | $0.18 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Nova Micro 1.0 | $2.14 | $0.74 |
Nova Micro 1.0 is $0.24 cheaper per 1M output tokens (63% lower; 2.7x difference).
DeepSeek V3.2 has 3.07K more context (1.02x larger).
Nova Micro 1.0 is $0.34 cheaper on the standard workload (76.2% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Nova Micro 1.0 has the lower input price; Nova Micro 1.0 has the lower output price; DeepSeek V3.2 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Nova Micro 1.0 is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.44 for DeepSeek V3.2 and $0.11 for Nova Micro 1.0.
Choose DeepSeek V3.2 when you care most about larger context window.
Choose Nova Micro 1.0 when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nova Micro 1.0 is estimated at $0.11 vs $0.44 for DeepSeek V3.2, saving $0.34 (76.2% lower).
- Nova Micro 1.0 is $0.34 cheaper on the standard workload (76.2% lower).
- Nova Micro 1.0 is $0.22 cheaper per 1M input tokens (86.1% lower; 7.2x difference).
- Nova Micro 1.0 is $0.24 cheaper per 1M output tokens (63% lower; 2.7x difference).
- DeepSeek V3.2 has 3.07K more context (1.02x larger).
| Feature | 🔥DeepSeek V3.2 (DeepSeek) | Nova Micro 1.0 (Amazon) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.252 | $0.035 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.378 | $0.14 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.44 | $0.11 |
| Context Window | 131.07K | 128K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #8 | #146 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Nova Micro 1.0 | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nova Micro 1.0 is estimated at $0.11 vs $0.44 for DeepSeek V3.2, saving $0.34 (76.2% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Nova Micro 1.0 | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Nova Micro 1.0 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | DeepSeek V3.2 | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) can replace DeepSeek V3.2 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash can replace DeepSeek V3.2 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.2.
- R1 Distill Qwen 32B can replace DeepSeek V3.2 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.43.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite offers 1.05M context with $0.3 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsDeepSeek catalog
Review all tracked DeepSeek models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open DeepSeek modelsAmazon catalog
Check other Amazon models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Amazon modelsDeepSeek-V3.2 is a large language model designed to harmonize high computational efficiency with strong reasoning and agentic tool-use performance. It introduces DeepSeek Sparse Attention (DSA), a fine-grained sparse attention mechanism...
Amazon Nova Micro 1.0 is a text-only model that delivers the lowest latency responses in the Amazon Nova family of models at a very low cost. With a context length...