Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is $0.45 cheaper per 1M input tokens (64.3% lower; 2.8x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
R1 vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Pick Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct for lower cost; pick R1 only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct for lower cost; pick R1 only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is estimated at $0.62 vs $1.95 for R1, saving $1.32 (67.9% lower).
Cost-first pickQwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Context-first pickR1
Sample savings$1.3267.9%
10x traffic gap$13.25
R1 has more context, but Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct saves $1.32 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $13.25. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | R1 | Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct | $4.75 | $1.62 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct | $3.2 | $1 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct | $13.2 | $4 |
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is $1.75 cheaper per 1M output tokens (70% lower; 3.33x difference).
R1 has 32.77K more context (1.25x larger).
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is $1.32 cheaper on the standard workload (67.9% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct has the lower input price; Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct has the lower output price; R1 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $1.95 for R1 and $0.62 for Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct.
Choose R1 when you care most about larger context window.
Choose Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is estimated at $0.62 vs $1.95 for R1, saving $1.32 (67.9% lower).
- Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is $1.32 cheaper on the standard workload (67.9% lower).
- Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is $0.45 cheaper per 1M input tokens (64.3% lower; 2.8x difference).
- Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is $1.75 cheaper per 1M output tokens (70% lower; 3.33x difference).
- R1 has 32.77K more context (1.25x larger).
| Feature | R1 (DeepSeek) | Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.7 | $0.25 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $2.5 | $0.75 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $1.95 | $0.62 |
| Context Window | 163.84K | 131.07K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #144 | #150 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is estimated at $0.62 vs $1.95 for R1, saving $1.32 (67.9% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | R1 | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) can replace R1 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash can replace R1 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.2.
- R1 Distill Qwen 32B can replace R1 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.43.
- DeepSeek V3.2 can replace R1 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.44.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro offers 1.05M context with $0.87 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsDeepSeek catalog
Review all tracked DeepSeek models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open DeepSeek modelsQwen catalog
Check other Qwen models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Qwen modelsDeepSeek R1 is here: Performance on par with [OpenAI o1](/openai/o1), but open-sourced and with fully open reasoning tokens. It's 671B parameters in size, with 37B active in an inference pass....
Qwen2.5-VL is proficient in recognizing common objects such as flowers, birds, fish, and insects. It is also highly capable of analyzing texts, charts, icons, graphics, and layouts within images.