API cost decision in 10 seconds

R1 vs Llama Guard 4 12B

Pick Llama Guard 4 12B when budget is the priority.

Page updated:  Data confirmed:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Llama Guard 4 12B when budget is the priority.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Llama Guard 4 12B is estimated at $0.27 vs $1.95 for R1, saving $1.68 (86.2% lower).

Cost-first pickLlama Guard 4 12B
Context-first pickBoth models
Sample savings$1.6886.2%
10x traffic gap$16.8

The reported context window is tied, so cost and provider fit carry more weight. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $16.8. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Llama Guard 4 12B stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickR1Llama Guard 4 12B
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputLlama Guard 4 12B$4.75$0.99
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputLlama Guard 4 12B$3.2$0.36
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputLlama Guard 4 12B$13.2$1.08
Cheaper input Llama Guard 4 12B $0.7 vs $0.18 / 1M

Llama Guard 4 12B is $0.52 cheaper per 1M input tokens (74.3% lower; 3.89x difference).

Cheaper output Llama Guard 4 12B $2.5 vs $0.18 / 1M

Llama Guard 4 12B is $2.32 cheaper per 1M output tokens (92.8% lower; 13.9x difference).

Larger context Tie 163.84K vs 163.84K

Both models report the same context window at 163.84K tokens.

Sample workload Llama Guard 4 12B $1.95 vs $0.27

Llama Guard 4 12B is $1.68 cheaper on the standard workload (86.2% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
R1 Calculating… Estimated API cost
Llama Guard 4 12B Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Llama Guard 4 12B has the lower input price; Llama Guard 4 12B has the lower output price; both models report the same context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Llama Guard 4 12B is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $1.95 for R1 and $0.27 for Llama Guard 4 12B.

Best Fit

Choose R1 when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.

Choose Llama Guard 4 12B when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Llama Guard 4 12B is estimated at $0.27 vs $1.95 for R1, saving $1.68 (86.2% lower).
  • Llama Guard 4 12B is $1.68 cheaper on the standard workload (86.2% lower).
  • Llama Guard 4 12B is $0.52 cheaper per 1M input tokens (74.3% lower; 3.89x difference).
  • Llama Guard 4 12B is $2.32 cheaper per 1M output tokens (92.8% lower; 13.9x difference).
  • Both models report the same context window at 163.84K tokens.
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureR1
(DeepSeek)
Llama Guard 4 12B
(Meta)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$0.7$0.18
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$2.5$0.18
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$1.95$0.27
Context Window163.84K163.84K
Release Date
Popularity#133#146

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionLlama Guard 4 12BOn the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Llama Guard 4 12B is estimated at $0.27 vs $1.95 for R1, saving $1.68 (86.2% lower).
High-volume input processingLlama Guard 4 12BLower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsLlama Guard 4 12BLower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workTieA larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
Larger context near this budget
  • Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
  • Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
  • MiMo-V2.5 offers 1.05M context with $0.28 sample workload cost.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

DeepSeek catalog

Review all tracked DeepSeek models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open DeepSeek models

Meta catalog

Check other Meta models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Meta models
R1

DeepSeek R1 is here: Performance on par with [OpenAI o1](/openai/o1), but open-sourced and with fully open reasoning tokens. It's 671B parameters in size, with 37B active in an inference pass....

Llama Guard 4 12B

Llama Guard 4 is a Llama 4 Scout-derived multimodal pretrained model, fine-tuned for content safety classification. Similar to previous versions, it can be used to classify content in both LLM...