Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is $0.2 cheaper per 1M input tokens (40% lower; 1.67x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
R1 0528 vs Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Pick Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) for lower cost; pick R1 0528 only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) for lower cost; pick R1 0528 only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is estimated at $1.55 vs $1.57 for R1 0528, saving $0.02 (1.6% lower).
Cost-first pickNano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Context-first pickR1 0528
Sample savings$0.021.6%
10x traffic gap$0.25
R1 0528 has more context, but Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) saves $0.02 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.25. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image), balanced workload favors R1 0528, and output-heavy chatbot favors R1 0528.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | R1 0528 | Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) | $3.58 | $2.75 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | R1 0528 | $2.65 | $2.8 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | R1 0528 | $11.25 | $12.8 |
R1 0528 is $0.35 cheaper per 1M output tokens (14% lower; 1.16x difference).
R1 0528 has 131.07K more context (5x larger).
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is $0.02 cheaper on the standard workload (1.6% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) has the lower input price; R1 0528 has the lower output price; R1 0528 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $1.57 for R1 0528 and $1.55 for Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image).
Choose R1 0528 when you care most about lower output-token price, and larger context window.
Choose Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) when you care most about lower input-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is estimated at $1.55 vs $1.57 for R1 0528, saving $0.02 (1.6% lower).
- Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is $0.02 cheaper on the standard workload (1.6% lower).
- Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is $0.2 cheaper per 1M input tokens (40% lower; 1.67x difference).
- R1 0528 is $0.35 cheaper per 1M output tokens (14% lower; 1.16x difference).
- R1 0528 has 131.07K more context (5x larger).
| Feature | R1 0528 (DeepSeek) | Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) (Google) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.5 | $0.3 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $2.15 | $2.5 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $1.57 | $1.55 |
| Context Window | 163.84K | 32.77K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #106 | #121 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is estimated at $1.55 vs $1.57 for R1 0528, saving $0.02 (1.6% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | R1 0528 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | R1 0528 | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) can replace R1 0528 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash can replace R1 0528 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.2.
- R1 Distill Qwen 32B can replace R1 0528 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.43.
- DeepSeek V3.2 can replace R1 0528 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.44.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro offers 1.05M context with $0.87 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsDeepSeek catalog
Review all tracked DeepSeek models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open DeepSeek modelsGoogle catalog
Check other Google models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Google modelsMay 28th update to the [original DeepSeek R1](/deepseek/deepseek-r1) Performance on par with [OpenAI o1](/openai/o1), but open-sourced and with fully open reasoning tokens. It's 671B parameters in size, with 37B active...
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image, a.k.a. "Nano Banana," is now generally available. It is a state of the art image generation model with contextual understanding. It is capable of image generation,...